Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 10-23-2007, 02:42 AM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: College Football Rank \'em --- Week 8

UATrewqaz....that is highly debatable considering the SEC has only finished the highest conference in the regular season once in the last 7 years on sagarin
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 10-23-2007, 02:57 AM
UATrewqaz UATrewqaz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,542
Default Re: College Football Rank \'em --- Week 8

One of the major difficulties as well, is that there are also different ways of measuring the "best" conference too. Differnet people have different criteria.

Is having 2-3 powerhouses and 8 punching bags better than having 4-5 very solid teams and 4 more mediocre ones?

That, combined with people's various biases, are why these debates go on so endlessly.
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 10-23-2007, 03:10 AM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Muckleshoot! Usually rebuying.
Posts: 15,163
Default Re: College Football Rank \'em --- Week 8

[ QUOTE ]
One of the major difficulties as well, is that there are also different ways of measuring the "best" conference too. Differnet people have different criteria.

Is having 2-3 powerhouses and 8 punching bags better than having 4-5 very solid teams and 4 more mediocre ones?

That, combined with people's various biases, are why these debates go on so endlessly.

[/ QUOTE ]

It might help the SEC's case if they ever learned how to travel(especially to the west side of the Mississippi) and play some tougher OOC games.(Kudos to Tenn this year)

b
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 10-23-2007, 03:27 AM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: College Football Rank \'em --- Week 8

my blog tomorrow is going to be on the BigEast being #1 in terms of conferences...shocked me, but the numbers could bear it out
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 10-23-2007, 03:30 AM
Semtex Semtex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 1,539
Default Re: College Football Rank \'em --- Week 8

[ QUOTE ]
my blog tomorrow is going to be on the BigEast being #1 in terms of conferences...shocked me, but the numbers could bear it out

[/ QUOTE ]
Sagarin has them at two I believe. I think a big part of it might be having 8 teams.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 10-23-2007, 03:50 AM
BobJoeJim BobJoeJim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ashland, OR
Posts: 1,450
Default Re: College Football Rank \'em --- Week 8

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Updated undefeated odds, according to Sagarin's predictor:

Ohio State: 46.4%
Kansas: 23.3%
Hawaii: 13.5%
Boston College: 11.9%
Arizona State: 11.1%

And for the one-loss teams not to lose again:
South Florida: 42.1%
Oregon: 35.1%
LSU: 29.3%
Oklahoma: 27.0%

I know, I should run the numbers on WVU and VT so that this covers the entire top ten. Maybe I will, but that would require adding to the spreadsheet rather than just updating it, so I also might not.

[/ QUOTE ]
USC please?

[/ QUOTE ]
According to Sagarin's predictor ratings, USC has a 0.16% chance of winning out. Part of me wanted to ignore this question, and say "I only rate teams in the BCS Top Ten" or something, but the karma of dismissing USC this week, as a Duck fan, was something I wanted to avoid.

The grain of salt on this number is that according to Sagarin USC should be an 18 point dog to Oregon this week, giving them a 10% win chance. The actual opening line was 2.5, so either the sports books are giving USC WAY more credit than they should, or else Sagarin is vastly underrating them (probably a little of both, imo), so their true odds of winning out are probably better than the 0.16% my spreadsheet spits out.
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 10-23-2007, 03:53 AM
NozeCandy NozeCandy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,943
Default Re: College Football Rank \'em --- Week 8

[ QUOTE ]
6 of the 8 opponents are fixed year after year, so there isn't that much variance.

[/ QUOTE ]
Uh, what? This can hugely affect things.
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 10-23-2007, 03:53 AM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: College Football Rank \'em --- Week 8

yeah...it's not like missing Ohio State helped out Wisconsin last year
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 10-23-2007, 04:19 AM
Semtex Semtex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 1,539
Default Re: College Football Rank \'em --- Week 8

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Updated undefeated odds, according to Sagarin's predictor:

Ohio State: 46.4%
Kansas: 23.3%
Hawaii: 13.5%
Boston College: 11.9%
Arizona State: 11.1%

And for the one-loss teams not to lose again:
South Florida: 42.1%
Oregon: 35.1%
LSU: 29.3%
Oklahoma: 27.0%

I know, I should run the numbers on WVU and VT so that this covers the entire top ten. Maybe I will, but that would require adding to the spreadsheet rather than just updating it, so I also might not.

[/ QUOTE ]
USC please?

[/ QUOTE ]
According to Sagarin's predictor ratings, USC has a 0.16% chance of winning out. Part of me wanted to ignore this question, and say "I only rate teams in the BCS Top Ten" or something, but the karma of dismissing USC this week, as a Duck fan, was something I wanted to avoid.

The grain of salt on this number is that according to Sagarin USC should be an 18 point dog to Oregon this week, giving them a 10% win chance. The actual opening line was 2.5, so either the sports books are giving USC WAY more credit than they should, or else Sagarin is vastly underrating them (probably a little of both, imo), so their true odds of winning out are probably better than the 0.16% my spreadsheet spits out.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure Sagarin is vastly underrating them. If my theory is right and USC's mid season hiccup was injury related, Sagarin would have no choice. The system probably has no way of accounting for low scoring wins and losses with an injury depleted team that will later be at full strength.
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 10-23-2007, 09:50 AM
zer0 zer0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 973
Default Re: College Football Rank \'em --- Week 8

[ QUOTE ]
my blog tomorrow is going to be on the BigEast being #1 in terms of conferences...shocked me, but the numbers could bear it out

[/ QUOTE ]

apologies if you've done it multiple times elsewhere, but could you post a link please?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.