![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Contest Parameters | |||
Smoked Bacon Only |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 48.00% |
Any Bacon Cut (unsmoked/pancetta) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
Let Analyst Decide |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 24.00% |
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1521
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hey guys I'm looking to buy a Party 400NL/600NL database with decent-ish coverage. PM me with offers, thanks |
#1522
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] hey what's your sn nomeansyes ? [/ QUOTE ] IMGUNNARAPEYA [/ QUOTE ] confirm its not [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] |
#1523
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Mat,
Thank you for your email. Unfortunately I am not at liberty to disclose player FRIA4EVER losing hand, during game session 6477444616. Due to the reason, that your opponent had selected the “Muck Losing Option” in advanced and since he lost the hand, and neither bet first or raised. This is the reason why his hand was mucked. Best Wishes, Karen Donnellan WTF PARTY POKER ARE SO FKN LAME So if 2 hands go to showdown this applies.Bahahahahahah DRUGS [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] |
#1524
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Hi Mat, Thank you for your email. Unfortunately I am not at liberty to disclose player FRIA4EVER losing hand, during game session 6477444616. Due to the reason, that your opponent had selected the “Muck Losing Option” in advanced and since he lost the hand, and neither bet first or raised. This is the reason why his hand was mucked. Best Wishes, Karen Donnellan WTF PARTY POKER ARE SO FKN LAME So if 2 hands go to showdown this applies.Bahahahahahah DRUGS [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Just sent this reply(doubt it will change much as they dont understand thier customers well or even thier own staff) Been discusing this with a few players and we all agreed that your wrong.We belive that when a player has "muck losing hand at showdwon"this simpally applies to the hand being not shown to the table at showdown and not being unavailable in the hand history is simpaly ridiclous. If i was playing poker LIVE and this happened and i requested to see the losing hand the dealer would not be able to refuse! So again i want to request this info and eblive this is a reasonable request as as far as i know muck at showdown losing hands/uncalled hands is only to not show the table the hand and the hand is still written to the hand history folder! Mat |
#1525
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you didn't really send that email as it is, did you?
|
#1526
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
you didn't really send that email as it is, did you? [/ QUOTE ] Few spelling mistakes but all the improtant parts are understandable |
#1527
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Hi Mat, Thank you for your email. Unfortunately I am not at liberty to disclose player FRIA4EVER losing hand, during game session 6477444616. Due to the reason, that your opponent had selected the “Muck Losing Option” in advanced and since he lost the hand, and neither bet first or raised. This is the reason why his hand was mucked. Best Wishes, Karen Donnellan WTF PARTY POKER ARE SO FKN LAME So if 2 hands go to showdown this applies.Bahahahahahah DRUGS [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Also this hand,i rember him cold calling preflop then overshoving all in on the flop over my flop bet and i snap it...... So why the fjuk dont i get to see this hand at SD |
#1528
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I got Aron Pacifici as my new party rep.
Good or bad? [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
#1529
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why don't you post the hand.
Anyway, has anybody bother to microstakes test this? I don't buy the Party line at all, as it's very uncommon for this to happen but the conditions they're saying make it apply are very common indeed. So, yet again, I believe this is Party support basically lying (well, probably the support people being told what lies to tell). |
#1530
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Theyre not strictly lying, its just that they dont understand the problem. They are however lying in that they are pretending to understand the problem when actually they do not.
|
![]() |
|
|