CYOA: Vortex - Page 15

KyrosMother · #**141** 03-29-2007, 12:31 PM

FWIW, I just finished rereading Jared's posts. The ones w/o vowels were a little tough. With that said, I would be hard-pressed to vote Nez or Sighing anytime soon.

My conclusions from my long post are simply that the following people would be lower on my radar, as they helped drive up Jared's BW. I am not saying I would never vote any of them, I am just saying I wouldn't vote any of them until I had some more info: Durron, KM (obviously I would never vote me), Luckay, Voj, Aaron, Mark

People who are staying on my radar, as a result of vote hoppng at the critical moment: FCBL and LC.

I know I cleared FCBL yesterday, but he is back on my radar, albeit lower than LC.

I need to go read the event, vote for the event, and get back to work. I will reread yesterday's voting and catch up on everything else tonight and vote then.

KyrosMother · #**142** 03-29-2007, 12:39 PM

[ QUOTE ]
He didnt recommend 2, he just investigated it.

If our goal is to get back to reality then 3 might give us the best chance.
Since they specifically said kills would be rand() if there were no more evils here, these types of events may be our only chance of getting out alive.

Sending an odd number kind of worries me though. Unlike shortline I find it unlikely that the only difference between 1, 2 and 3 would be the number.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's also possible sending 2 means 2 get through and 1 dies. For the lack of any more knowledge, I think going with Shorty's view is our best option.

Nez477 · #**143** 03-29-2007, 12:42 PM

If one of our players die in an in-game day event that would suck. It would bring down my enjoyment level from 100% to like 98%.

sighing · #**144** 03-29-2007, 12:45 PM

Shortline's message basically seems to indicate that anyone we send to investigate will be sucked through. Maybe a little variation on that, but basically. I'm not sure if that's a good idea or not, other than that I'm curious what happened in the other thread. Presumably they're sending someone here as well.

Aka not sure what to vote, but I'll go along with whatever. I'd probably prefer doing nothing or sending a minimum, in case there's death involved.

In case I can't post again today, lynch tiedup. This is really entirely based on his response to shortline's journal calling him a wolf. Shortline is good at this game, and a journal would have no FPS in it, so it can be considered the honest opinion of a confirmed villager.

econophile · #**145** 03-29-2007, 12:51 PM

voting for 2 is correct since we have no idea what happens when we send 3

sighing · #**146** 03-29-2007, 12:52 PM

That's a good point. 0 or 2 would be my inclination.

Nez477 · #**147** 03-29-2007, 12:52 PM

[ QUOTE ]
voting for 2 is correct since we have no idea what happens when we send 3

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously, based on today alone Econophile and Tiedup would be no.1 and no.2 on my vote list.

So you are saying we KNOW what happens with all the other 3 options?

Nez477 · #**148** 03-29-2007, 12:55 PM

[ QUOTE ]
That's a good point. 0 or 2 would be my inclination.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm really confused.

Shorty told us what happens with 2 people. That is it. I want to send 2 or 3 people over there, and two is probablt the safest based on us knowing the outcome.

TIEdup14 · #**149** 03-29-2007, 12:58 PM

ffs, this is ridiculous. I'm getting lynched just because I disagree with this:

[ QUOTE ]
Shortline is good at this game

[/ QUOTE ]

Nevertheless I think Nez is a villager, and sighing doesnt really make me suspicious.

Vote FCBL

TIEdup14 · #**150** 03-29-2007, 01:01 PM

In case it wasnt obvious, I'm voting FCBL because of his voting pattern yesterday. Looked like he was trying to save Jared.

Sighing is probably a villager; I wouldnt put it past Jared to leave his last vote on sighing in order to try to cast more suspicion on an already (apparently to everyone but me) suspicious person