![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just got this email this morning...
Dear PowPowMeow, Thank you for your communication regarding the accounts that you suspected to be playing multiple entries by the same player in our Tournaments. These accounts (all associated with account ZeeJustin) had already been flagged by our system as originating from the same IP/System and we have now concluded our investigation. A total of six accounts, all with different biographical information, were making multiple entries into the same tournament from the same IP/system. This is in direct violation of our Terms and Conditions and the six accounts have been permanently closed and the player barred from our site. We have placed a substantial amount of money, from all the accounts, on hold. Any of the confiscated money found to be directly related to a particular player or tournament through means of cheating, will be redistributed accordingly. We make every reasonable effort to protect the integrity of our games and have very recently introduced some technical enhancements in an attempt to prevent such scenarios. These improvements are ongoing and as you can appreciate, have to take into account the interests of genuine players who share internet connections and access points. Thank you for taking the time to report this matter and for being as passionate as we are about integrity. michael o'malley | poker room manager partygaming.com | mikeo@partygaming.com p. +350 78700 x6039 | m. +44 7958 021237 Wonder who the next multi accounter to get caught will be. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
:O
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
a side issue perhaps, but has this actually been established?
I did assume last year that the Omid777 account, which was registered to Sherman Oaks and showed up to play a few high buyin hu matches around the time he wrote about playing them and then disappeared was related to him - but since this account played on the day he won the $215 with his main account and Lee says the win was legit i assume not... any ideas? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
a side issue perhaps, but has this actually been established? I did assume last year that the Omid777 account, which was registered to Sherman Oaks and showed up to play a few high buyin hu matches around the time he wrote about playing them and then disappeared was related to him - but since this account played on the day he won the $215 with his main account and Lee says the win was legit i assume not... any ideas? [/ QUOTE ] I'm surprised no one has reacted to this post. It would surprise me if Justin did not multi-account in his big Pokerstars win, and Lee Jones is just doing his best to play the whole thing down. There are a lot more answers required before this affair is put to rest. In short this has highlighted that there are huge huge holes in PokerStars game integrity and rather than clean it up they are happier to try and sweep it under the carpet and hope everyone forgets. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ZeeJustin and JJ are cheaters. Plain and simple. They both deserve to lose all that money. They should both be ashamed that they can consider themselves "professionals", yet they cheat by having numerous accounts in the same tourney (sit and go). what a joke they both are.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
is this thread long enough
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The other problem with collusion especially at party is that so many people play their at any given time.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We havn't seen this kind of reaction since Poker Spot and Dutch Boyd.
While the on-line game could use some cleaning up is all the hate warented. Also has anyone read all of this close to 2000 post thread? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
We havn't seen this kind of reaction since Poker Spot and Dutch Boyd. While the on-line game could use some cleaning up is all the hate warented. Also has anyone read all of this close to 2000 post thread? [/ QUOTE ] After a while its just different people saying the same things over and over and over. I was pretty bored last night and I tried to, but its just too much. |
![]() |
|
|