Never Trust Anyone

[Kneel B4 Zod]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Brandi,

Newhizzle is a good guy. I started IMing with him about 3 months ago. Within less than 5 minutes, we actually agreed to an inter account transfer for 5 figures. He sent first. It was great that he would trust a basic stranger like this, based upon my reputation and his trusting nature. It's sad that this no longer exists thanks to a whore like you. How can you live with yourself after stealing $30k from someone who was helping you out? And then come on here and spread filth about him? It's clear from the hands posted that you are a TERRIBLE poker player, too. If you want to sleep with poker players in order to get their money, why not become an actual whore? There's good money in for you, enough to pay back Mark within a year and still have some money left over for yourself.

There is no credibility for you here after what Mark posted.

Kindly [censored] off,

Dean

[/ QUOTE ]How did she she steal anything from him? He gave her permission to play, and it was quite obvious that she was playing higher and he even says that he gave her permission to play $10/20.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm still waiting for an answer to this one, for reality's sake. You're more respected so maybe you'll get it.

[/ QUOTE ]

she really didn't steal from him, unless there was some fancy chip dumping going on, which she doesn't seem smart enough to pull off.

or unless she transfered money to her account, which doesn't seem like the case.

her idea was probably to win money and then ask for a cut, ala Ginger.

edit: that doesn't make what she was doing anything close to ok.

[heater]

[ QUOTE ]
despite the low post count, i've been lurking this forum for long time and respect the opinions of many posters.

pokulator has received praise, threats, offers, and criticism for posting the videos.

should they be posted?

please PM if more appropriate

[/ QUOTE ]

PLEASE post them.

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[suzzer99]

I guess ol Capn' Tom just didn't have a big enough I or W to overcome his A.

http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/sfo/244121909.html

<<<>>>
Creeeepppppyyy Old Men, and the Golddiggers that love them
Date: 2006-12-04, 3:17PM PST


ahem

Just so we are very clear.

For arguments sake, let us define the "Position", P, as your standard 20 something "hot chick" on her knees, top off, mouth wide open ready to recieve a standard male member.

The rate at which said 20 something reaches the "Position" is a function of the man's physical attractiveness( A), wealth (W), and percieved power/ influence (I) ( CEO/ politican/ or outlaw biker factor) and has pratically nothing to do with intelligence, morals, values how nice he is. This relationship can be derived via classical ladder theory and is expressed as:

dP/dt = aA+bW+cI

Where a, b and c are weighting factors. Emperical studies show that in general for all women c>b>a, so power and wealth more strongly influence dP/dt.

Escorts, who assume the Position for any guy regardless of age or looks for an agreed upon fee can be fit into this theory if we generalize that the wealth term W, is really an expectation of wealth transfer over a given time frame, delta t. Then we see that there is an equivlence to a wealthy man that will transfer money and gifts over a long time period in return for many servicings and an ordinary man who pays the fee for one hour of servicing, implying:

W = (Money Transfered)/t or

W = (MT/t)

So the theory holds.

The formula can be generalized to all women by adding a term that tends to decrease dP/dt with age for the woman, but for now we can keep it simple by assuming that all women under the age of, say , 32 can be described as essentially escorts, trading sex for status and stuff.

Now, if we assume that the definition of creepy is dP/dt => O, or infinite time for her to achieve position P, then

0= aA+bW+cI

A=-(bW+cI)/a

A = (-b/a)W + (-c/a)I

This implies that if the guy has even a modicum of wealth or percieved power ( either outlaw or legitimate) then for him to be considered creepy he would have to lack teeth and muscle tone, weigh 400 lbs, and smell like a diseased farm hog.

This then explains the origional poster. She is on a bart train, where she has no way of acertaing either W or I from simply looking at the guy that is looking at her, so she assumes worst case low values. Since she assumes W and I to be low to non existant (where any guy making a middle class living is considered to be at 0 for both W and I), A would have to be very large (male Calvin Klein Model type) to get dP/dt positive. Hence, the guy is considered "creepy".

However, if the same guy were met, let's say, at a reception at an art gallery and was introduced as a very successful corporate sales executive driving a late model imported sports car, he might find it a tad embarrising explaing why there was a half naked young woman on the floor in front of him tugging on his fly.

It also explains the guy on the bart train. He knows he has money and or influence, and from experience knows that girls just like her are avaialable to him almost at a whim. But he has no way to communicate his W or I accurately, and since his A is never usually a problem, he does not understand the impact of its low intrinsic value.

So we can see, the definition "creepy" is really a non existant concept, instead simply the result of an inability to communicate proper W and I values in a public setting, or the unfortunate consequence of the rare man who has low A, I and W values, in which case the original poster just likes bashing the unfortunate.

[JuntMonkey]

Okay so this Doyle business. He didn't give her $2,000 right? That seems to have been misinterpreted. I think it went like this:

- Brandi talks to Doyle, who listens somewhat sympathetically and says he'll see what he can do. He may have some idea of who this girl is though and has heard the rumors, so he takes it with a grain of salt.

- Brandi sees Tom shortly after her conversation with Doyle, Tom gives her $2,000. Brandi figures Doyle talked to Tom and that she will get her money back. Doyle never gave her any money.

- Brandi calls Doyle to get the scoop, Doyle has no more sympathy and says that Tom told him a different story. Tom probably told Doyle that Brandi was coming on to him and/or promised sex and/or whatever. His story is totally different than what she said, and probably more true.


I know everyone is saying how she's not actually a very good player, but there haven't been many comments on the absurdity of having a $12,000 roll for the $10,000 tournament circuit.

[heater]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
despite the low post count, i've been lurking this forum for long time and respect the opinions of many posters.

pokulator has received praise, threats, offers, and criticism for posting the videos.

should they be posted?

please PM if more appropriate

[/ QUOTE ]


pokulator,

I haven't clicked on a single one of those links because I don't care to watch scum/scammers interact with each other. It would be just like watching a webcam of 2 convicted murderers and who are cellmates going after each other's butts at night.

But anyone complaining/threatening you should be ignored. Unless it clearly was a one time thing embarassing someone who otherwise doesn't act that way. Otherwise it's a just a case of a scum/scammer reaping what they sew and not wanting to be seen clearly for what they are.

[/ QUOTE ]

There you go. Post them to spite BluffThis.

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[mlagoo]

suzzer, thats pretty great

[Alfil]

The irony of this threads title no longer escapes me and I didn't even have to think about donating in order to get it because I distrust everyone already.

[mlagoo]

[ QUOTE ]
I know everyone is saying how she's not actually a very good player, but there haven't been many comments on the absurdity of having a $12,000 roll for the $10,000 tournament circuit.

[/ QUOTE ]

there have been at least a dozen comments on this if not more.

the whole idea of her life is absurd -- the blog post where she said she expects to have two million dollars by 26 and is excited about the third million she intends to earn by 28... this is a likely clinically insane girl playing 10k tournaments on a 12k bankroll (which really means offering 30k buttsecks, or varying degrees thereof) with the delusion that shes going to become rich, when the problem is she isnt actually good at the game (both in terms of skill and bankroll management). its sad.

[UATrewqaz]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQe40ycRQ0s

SNL sketch I thought of, only slightly relevant.

[okterrific]

[ QUOTE ]
Question:

How likely is a chip dump rather than her straight out losing the cash? How closely would a site monitor this kind of thing?

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe newhizzle can post some of her hand histories.
it would be fun at least to see how she plays. And we could maybe determine if she chip dumped and who she chip dumped to .

might be interesting.

even if newhizzle does not make it public i hope he at least saves them so in the future he can look at them and laugh about it.