|
View Poll Results: Who is in the more wrong here? | |||
Anacardo mega wrong | 3 | 2.31% | |
Anacardo semi wrong | 6 | 4.62% | |
meh, can't tell | 31 | 23.85% | |
Kitty semi wrong | 40 | 30.77% | |
kitty mega wrong. | 50 | 38.46% | |
Voters: 130. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1391
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Today I became a pro.
RRiz,
If people staked him for the Sunday Mil and he won it for 150k+, I'm pretty sure that would be the greatest thing in the history of the universe. |
#1392
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Today I became a pro.
[ QUOTE ]
RRiz, If people staked him for the Sunday Mil and he won it for 150k+, I'm pretty sure that would be the greatest thing in the history of the universe. [/ QUOTE ] folk songs will be told about the great Wickss a thousand years from now... |
#1393
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Today I became a pro.
Here's my banal attempt at humour:
Wicks STD? |
#1394
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Today I became a pro.
[ QUOTE ]
Here's my banal attempt at humour: Wicks STD? [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img][img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img][img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Immense. |
#1395
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Today I became a pro.
[ QUOTE ]
we should prolly come up with a collection and stake Wickss for the Sunday Million. [/ QUOTE ] Count me in... |
#1396
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Today I became a pro.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] we should prolly come up with a collection and stake Wickss for the Sunday Million. [/ QUOTE ] Count me in... [/ QUOTE ] In for $10 - standard 50/50 backing deal. |
#1397
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Today I became a pro.
I gave my $13 already . . . wasn't such a popular choice with the masses then.
|
#1398
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Today I became a pro.
Wickss,
Interested in playing the Sunday Million this week? Anyone want to coordinate this? I'm going out of town this weekend. |
#1399
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Today I became a pro.
lol... 1pm every morning
|
#1400
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Today I became a pro.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] PokerStars Game #9475036941: Tournament #48101352, $6.00+$0.50 Hold'em No Limit - Level IX (300/600) - 2007/04/17 - 19:42:25 (ET) Table '48101352 1' 9-max Seat #4 is the button Seat 1: marcapp (3644 in chips) Seat 4: wickss79 (3650 in chips) Seat 5: 20STEVE20 (2093 in chips) Seat 6: iammrcoffee (4113 in chips) marcapp: posts the ante 50 wickss79: posts the ante 50 20STEVE20: posts the ante 50 iammrcoffee: posts the ante 50 20STEVE20: posts small blind 300 iammrcoffee: posts big blind 600 *** HOLE CARDS *** marcapp: folds wickss79: raises 3000 to 3600 and is all-in 20STEVE20: folds iammrcoffee: calls 3000 *** FLOP *** [3c As Th] *** TURN *** [3c As Th] [Qc] *** RIVER *** [3c As Th Qc] [Jd] *** SHOW DOWN *** iammrcoffee: shows [Qd Kh] (a straight, Ten to Ace) wickss79: shows [Qh 6s] (a pair of Queens) iammrcoffee collected 7700 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 7700 | Rake 0 Board [3c As Th Qc Jd] Seat 1: marcapp folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 4: wickss79 (button) showed [Qh 6s] and lost with a pair of Queens Seat 5: 20STEVE20 (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 6: iammrcoffee (big blind) showed [Qd Kh] and won (7700) with a straight, Ten to Ace I'm not a SNG player so i have zero expertise but this seems silly... [/ QUOTE ] Standard. If he stakes this down uncontested he takes the chip lead and can start pwning with any 2 on the next hand. [/ QUOTE ] I don't have SNGW at work, but this does not seem like a good push to me... somewhat equal stacks, pushing Q6o from BTN... seems a lttle loose even at these blinds. From SB I push, or possibly if stacks are not so close. Can anyone run these #'s? |
|
|