#131
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CONCLUSION:
Or start cold decking them.
|
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CONCLUSION:
[ QUOTE ]
Or start decking them. [/ QUOTE ] FYP |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
This is just disgusting. I think we should boycott UB or something...I just don't know how we can get them back...
|
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
wow. have any of you who said you cant call collusion based on one hand started to change your mind now that there are 4 which are very supsicious to say the least? [/ QUOTE ] No, I haven't changed my mind that you can't call collusion based on one hand. However now that you look at a bunch of hands, it does seem weird! |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Some More Hands
Did anyone else think this hand was really weird?
NYPlayer: 9d 8d dumbanimal: -- -- piejay: -- -- hogbird: -- -- Pre-flop: NYPlayer raises to $600. dumbanimal re-raises to $900. piejay folds. hogbird re-raises to $1200. NYPlayer calls. dumbanimal calls. Flop (board: Tc Ah 5c): hogbird bets $300. NYPlayer folds. dumbanimal calls. Turn (board: Tc Ah 5c As): hogbird bets $600. dumbanimal calls. River (board: Tc Ah 5c As 4s): hogbird checks. dumbanimal checks. Showdown: hogbird shows Kd Ac. hogbird has Kd Ac Tc Ah As: three aces. dumbanimal mucks cards. (dumbanimal has 9h Jh.) |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Some More Hands
Yeah it looks weird. I mean either they ar cheating or dumb animal is pretty bad at poker. Everyone here knows that is not the case, which is why this looks so bad.
|
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Some More Hands
hongbird either effed up in his collusion strategy or did it on purpose and made a mistake in doing so (i.e. he thought his partner would bet the river and he'd c'r to mask the times the action goes like that to block out a 3rd player)
either way, this thread has given me plenty of confidence in the hypothesis that dumb and hong are very good colluders and pla ying in any game where they are sitting is not a good idea. the fact that there are examples of them NOT colluding imo only strengthen the above hypothesis. Barron |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Some More Hands
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah it looks weird. I mean either they ar cheating or dumb animal is pretty bad at poker. Everyone here knows that is not the case, which is why this looks so bad. [/ QUOTE ] The last hand, why would that be cheating? One player played it completely normally and the other guy simply spewed chips with zero outs while headsup. |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Some More Hands
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yeah it looks weird. I mean either they ar cheating or dumb animal is pretty bad at poker. Everyone here knows that is not the case, which is why this looks so bad. [/ QUOTE ] The last hand, why would that be cheating? One player played it completely normally and the other guy simply spewed chips with zero outs while headsup. [/ QUOTE ] b/c the player who spewed chips doesn't do that against anybody else add in the fact he's likely colluding w/ the opponent and suddenly it looks much more likely than a mistake in collusion than poor holdem poker play. Barron |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Some More Hands
[ QUOTE ]
and the other guy simply spewed chips with zero outs while headsup. [/ QUOTE ] Bait for observers. |
|
|