#131
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Revisiting the Forum Split Idea
Its just alot easier for us NL200 guys to post in NL100 than it is to post below that. Of course, since im selfish, I read the NL100 posts and above so we should split there..lol.
DLM, im disappointed to not be on your NL200 list. Now I really need to start posting more hands! and play more hands. |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Revisiting the Forum Split Idea
[ QUOTE ]
Its just alot easier for us NL200 guys to post in NL100 than it is to post below that. Of course, since im selfish, I read the NL100 posts and above so we should split there..lol. DLM, im disappointed to not be on your NL200 list. Now I really need to start posting more hands! and play more hands. [/ QUOTE ] dude that list was compiled in less than 30 seconds. If i spent time on it i could find 40+ people who have posted some stuff here. and thats not even counting the guys who came here for a couple days then thought this place sucked ass and left. |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Revisiting the Forum Split Idea
100+ split.
|
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Revisiting the Forum Split Idea
[ QUOTE ]
100+ split. [/ QUOTE ] Great post... Pfft. How about posting your thoguhts on the matter? and why you want it 100+? |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Revisiting the Forum Split Idea
100NL+ split ftw.
Anything else would be really, really uneven. |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Revisiting the Forum Split Idea
X-posted in AtF.
Seems to be an influx of posters wanting 200NL+. I strongly disagree with this. 100NL plays a LOT closer to 200NL than it does the micro stakes. Not to mention that the traffic would be really lopsided if it were split 200NL+. Seems those that want the 200NL+ are mostly interested in having their own small community. This goes against encouraging growth, etc. |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Revisiting the Forum Split Idea
Im heading out for the afternoon. Hopefully when I get back the discussion will still be going on.
I really think we need to hear from a lot more of the 200NL+ players and what thier thoughts are on the split. I get the impression the majority of them share my views about it becoming 200+... |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Revisiting the Forum Split Idea
[ QUOTE ]
I really think we need to hear from a lot more of the 200NL+ players and what thier thoughts are on the split. I get the impression the majority of them share my views about it becoming 200+... [/ QUOTE ] Why do you only want opinions of 200+ players? |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Revisiting the Forum Split Idea
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I really think we need to hear from a lot more of the 200NL+ players and what thier thoughts are on the split. I get the impression the majority of them share my views about it becoming 200+... [/ QUOTE ] Why do you only want opinions of 200+ players? [/ QUOTE ] Because they are going to primarily make up the community of the other forum, NL100 for most of us (you and me are raelly some of the exceptions) is a transistional level and evenetually the solid players move up to NL200 and beyond, since most of the content in the new forum (if there is one) is going to be NL200+, I think thier opinions are very important and under represented. |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Revisiting the Forum Split Idea
You strike me as a scientist who hand-picks only certain data to back up his thesis.
Everybody's opinion on this should valued, not just the select few who want their own small community, |
|
|