![]() |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I'm so excited. I've been reading BBV for exactly one year now, and last MSPaint I didn't understand at all. This year, I should at least chuckle. [/ QUOTE ] do you think passaman will do a cool 666 post? |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wow first ive heard of this where the hell have i been
|
#133
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTYS, with all the hype on pennpal you have nothing to worry about, you're the underdog and all the pressure is on him.
worst case scenario just doctor up a fake MSPAINT also, the susupense is killing me!!! |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
here's an idea for getting from 24 to 4 -
how about we go 24 -> 12 -> 6, then when 6 are left, the other 18 have a free for all where the single highest scoring ms paint from the 18 losers gets back into the game to make the final 4 (3 winners of the 3 quarterfinal matches + 1 wildcard = 4) |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I really like that idea [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
|
#136
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
alreturns (11:18:45 PM): lol
alreturns (11:18:51 PM): your being setup alreturns (11:18:55 PM): for failure |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
here's an idea for getting from 24 to 4 - how about we go 24 -> 12 -> 6, then when 6 are left, the other 18 have a free for all where the single highest scoring ms paint from the 18 losers gets back into the game to make the final 4 (3 winners of the 3 quarterfinal matches + 1 wildcard = 4) [/ QUOTE ] For it to be a true fourth- the last three eliminated would also need to be allowed back in- which makes an entire extra step between cutting to 3 and starting the semi-finals. I have no opinion on whether that's a bad thing or not, I'm just pointing out your fourth best could actually still be in the final 6 at at that point and not be included under the model you just proposed. Now I await being called a nit for pointing that out. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] here's an idea for getting from 24 to 4 - how about we go 24 -> 12 -> 6, then when 6 are left, the other 18 have a free for all where the single highest scoring ms paint from the 18 losers gets back into the game to make the final 4 (3 winners of the 3 quarterfinal matches + 1 wildcard = 4) [/ QUOTE ] For it to be a true fourth- the last three eliminated would also need to be allowed back in- which makes an entire extra step between cutting to 3 and starting the semi-finals. I have no opinion on whether that's a bad thing or not, I'm just pointing out your fourth best could actually still be in the final 6 at at that point and not be included under the model you just proposed. Now I await being called a nit for pointing that out. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] nit it's not perfect, but seriously, it's an 18 (or 21) to 1 shot. (nit) |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ty. I feel validated now.
I like the idea of some wrestleback free for all like you suggested. I just had to nit it up a bit. |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I actually am in favor of BTYS's suggestion, even though it might sneak him through the first round, of 24 -> 16 (4 highest ranking losers from round 1 move on and face each other). Barring that, the wildcard idea is interesting, but I doubt I'm going to want to put much effort into a 1 in 18 shot if I've already lost IMO.
I am in favor of poll (pole) voting and pledge not to use gimmick accounts to tamper with the vote. I don't have any suspicions about the integrity of the other players, either. |
![]() |
|
|