Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 06-12-2007, 01:15 PM
btmagnetw btmagnetw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,713
Default Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth

david needs a PR person. he's almost as bad as olivert.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 06-12-2007, 01:25 PM
EvanJC EvanJC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: way down deep
Posts: 4,175
Default Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth

[ QUOTE ]
Still she looks good for being 25.


[/ QUOTE ]


and with those six words and a number ds totally redeems himself. [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] david.

however, it is kind of hard to believe that you could have even scanned the original thread and gotten to the POB jokes w/out at least picking up some context stuff about newhizzle.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 06-12-2007, 01:25 PM
NickdaNutz NickdaNutz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 340
Default Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth

David.....whats your phone #? My boss wants to chew you out for making me unproductive today.
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 06-12-2007, 01:25 PM
Supp Bro Supp Bro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 267
Default Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth


David, if I may be so bold as to offer you a sound piece of advice at this point:

Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 06-12-2007, 01:27 PM
David Sklansky David Sklansky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,092
Default Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth

[ QUOTE ]
since when did everyone decide that polygraphs produced correct results? With people who are insane, they can certainly "believe" in this alternate reality that they have convinced themselves actually happened. For brandi, she could easily be insane to the point where she is convinced she didnt lose the money she actually lost. This being the case, she would pass the polygraph, everyone on here would believe shes right and she would still be wrong. I dont think the polygraph would do anything.

[/ QUOTE ]

It would do plenty. Whether the deluded one was Brandi or Mark. I already said that they both might pass. But in my book, and in the book of most professional gamblers, such a result (assuming the polygraph wasn't scammed) has a big implication compared to one of them failing.
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 06-12-2007, 01:31 PM
MiltonFriedman MiltonFriedman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waaay down below
Posts: 1,627
Default Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I\'m done

"Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done"....

That is not a very inviting proposition, the meaning of which could be misconstrued.
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 06-12-2007, 01:34 PM
pokervintage pokervintage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 220
Default Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth

[ QUOTE ]
Any other questions?

[/ QUOTE ]

So, are you saying that you would only have sex with honest girls? If so, you really are....sad.

pokervintage
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 06-12-2007, 02:50 PM
PITTM PITTM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: this forum again I will ban you. If you send me an email or private message, I will ban you.
Posts: 11,293
Default Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
since when did everyone decide that polygraphs produced correct results? With people who are insane, they can certainly "believe" in this alternate reality that they have convinced themselves actually happened. For brandi, she could easily be insane to the point where she is convinced she didnt lose the money she actually lost. This being the case, she would pass the polygraph, everyone on here would believe shes right and she would still be wrong. I dont think the polygraph would do anything.

[/ QUOTE ]

It would do plenty. Whether the deluded one was Brandi or Mark. I already said that they both might pass. But in my book, and in the book of most professional gamblers, such a result (assuming the polygraph wasn't scammed) has a big implication compared to one of them failing.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, but my point is that you dont want something with "big implications" to be based off of a test that doesnt test whether one is "telling the truth" so much as "not straying away from what they believe to be the truth". These are VERY different things in the mind of brandi. At least from the things I have read.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 06-12-2007, 02:57 PM
El Diablo El Diablo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 33,802
Default Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth

David,

"Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done."

What is the wager?
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 06-12-2007, 02:59 PM
fees fees is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Whats my motivation? LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Posts: 4,162
Default Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth

DS.. FFS WE ALL WANT TO KNOW

1. did brandi turn 1k into 200k? do you even know if its true? Did you tell her what a CD is.. cuz uh.. she didn't figure that out on her own for damn sure


2. Capt Tom Franklin.... WHAT HAPPENED .. IF YOU DONT WANT TO ELABORATE SAY SO PLZ
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.