#131
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
david needs a PR person. he's almost as bad as olivert.
|
#132
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
Still she looks good for being 25. [/ QUOTE ] and with those six words and a number ds totally redeems himself. [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] david. however, it is kind of hard to believe that you could have even scanned the original thread and gotten to the POB jokes w/out at least picking up some context stuff about newhizzle. |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
David.....whats your phone #? My boss wants to chew you out for making me unproductive today.
|
#134
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
David, if I may be so bold as to offer you a sound piece of advice at this point: |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
since when did everyone decide that polygraphs produced correct results? With people who are insane, they can certainly "believe" in this alternate reality that they have convinced themselves actually happened. For brandi, she could easily be insane to the point where she is convinced she didnt lose the money she actually lost. This being the case, she would pass the polygraph, everyone on here would believe shes right and she would still be wrong. I dont think the polygraph would do anything. [/ QUOTE ] It would do plenty. Whether the deluded one was Brandi or Mark. I already said that they both might pass. But in my book, and in the book of most professional gamblers, such a result (assuming the polygraph wasn't scammed) has a big implication compared to one of them failing. |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I\'m done
"Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done"....
That is not a very inviting proposition, the meaning of which could be misconstrued. |
#137
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
Any other questions? [/ QUOTE ] So, are you saying that you would only have sex with honest girls? If so, you really are....sad. pokervintage |
#138
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] since when did everyone decide that polygraphs produced correct results? With people who are insane, they can certainly "believe" in this alternate reality that they have convinced themselves actually happened. For brandi, she could easily be insane to the point where she is convinced she didnt lose the money she actually lost. This being the case, she would pass the polygraph, everyone on here would believe shes right and she would still be wrong. I dont think the polygraph would do anything. [/ QUOTE ] It would do plenty. Whether the deluded one was Brandi or Mark. I already said that they both might pass. But in my book, and in the book of most professional gamblers, such a result (assuming the polygraph wasn't scammed) has a big implication compared to one of them failing. [/ QUOTE ] yes, but my point is that you dont want something with "big implications" to be based off of a test that doesnt test whether one is "telling the truth" so much as "not straying away from what they believe to be the truth". These are VERY different things in the mind of brandi. At least from the things I have read. |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
David,
"Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done." What is the wager? |
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
DS.. FFS WE ALL WANT TO KNOW
1. did brandi turn 1k into 200k? do you even know if its true? Did you tell her what a CD is.. cuz uh.. she didn't figure that out on her own for damn sure 2. Capt Tom Franklin.... WHAT HAPPENED .. IF YOU DONT WANT TO ELABORATE SAY SO PLZ |
|
|