Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 11-05-2007, 08:48 PM
kyleb kyleb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the death of baseball
Posts: 10,765
Default Re: Adrian Peterson is not Overrated, statistical comparison CTaylor -

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But why is he so much more successful in the NFL than he was in college?

[/ QUOTE ]
Sample size? He's only had 158 carries. Way too early to say he's more successful now than at Oklahoma.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's what JoA is saying.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 11-05-2007, 08:50 PM
SL__72 SL__72 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The gun show.
Posts: 4,023
Default Re: Adrian Peterson is not Overrated, statistical comparison CTaylor -

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Like Pudge said, in 2005, Peterson "only" averaged 5.0 ypc despite breaking off plenty of long runs. This would seem to indicate a few things:

1) Either Peterson has always been somewhat of a boom or bust back or he's been facing 9 guys in the box his whole career.
2) Peterson is probably running sick hot. 6.6 ypc is of course unsustainable. He should finish above 5 but I doubt it'll be above 6.
3) Peterson could settle into the 4.5-5.0 range but plenty of awesome backs like LT have bad averages. In fact, LT only has 3 years of 4.5ypc or greater.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYI defenses have stacked the box on him from high school. It's not some sort of new thing now...

His college offensive coordinator even said. Because teams stack they have a better chance at a tackle for a loss but if he gets to the 2nd level he's going to take it all the way.

Which is exactly what me and a couple of other posters have been trying to say.

[/ QUOTE ]

But why is he so much more successful in the NFL than he was in college? And if stacking the box means he breaks off 50 yard runs with regularity, isn't that a bad idea to say the least?

[/ QUOTE ]

Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 11-05-2007, 09:03 PM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re: Adrian Peterson is not Overrated, statistical comparison CTaylor -

he could be running hot on big runs, and cold on the shorter runs

in that the line could be breaking down more often than normal, but also just killing defenders a couple extra times a game opening huge holes

think of it like getting running hot on sklansky bucks but cold on raw #s of AA/KK/sets+
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 11-05-2007, 11:03 PM
RandomUser RandomUser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 678
Default Re: Adrian Peterson is not Overrated, statistical comparison CTaylor -

I agree with the 'shot out of the cannon' analogy. His explosiveness through the hole is what set's him apart from the majority of other backs.

Everyone else seems to be in slow motion while he explodes through the line and into the secondary. That is common in college, but not something you see often in the pros due to the much higher level of athleticism across the board.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 11-05-2007, 11:19 PM
apefish apefish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: To the pain
Posts: 4,673
Default Re: Adrian Peterson is not Overrated, statistical comparison CTaylor -

[ QUOTE ]

Even though I specifically said it in my post, I feel as if you ignored it. Let me repeat:


[/ QUOTE ]

Not at all. I brought the numbers up to date for people who were going to use it to latch onto the "he has a great line" aspect or "his numbers really only stand out on the left side" and run with it.
There was a whole lot of that going on.

Your disclaimer was very clear.

The left side of his line is one of the best in football.
The right side isn't.

It should be clear why up to date numbers were posted.
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 11-05-2007, 11:28 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Adrian Peterson is not Overrated, statistical comparison CTaylor -

When Shaun won his MVP he ran better to his right than to his left.
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 11-06-2007, 12:08 AM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Muckleshoot! Usually rebuying.
Posts: 15,163
Default Re: Adrian Peterson is not Overrated, statistical comparison CTaylor -

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Watching him in college left me with a large man crush on Reggie Bush.

I think Peterson is a MUCH better back for the pro game. However, he needs to run with more care for his body, or he's going to miss a fuckload of games.

[/ QUOTE ]

Injuries happen to all RBs. Avoiding the hits is obviously a useful skill but eventually injuries will happen to everybody. You can only hope its not too serious such as an ACL.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, everybody gets hurt. Some people get hurt a lot more than others because they insist on jumping around and throwing themselves into people without any regard for their own goodwill.

[/ QUOTE ]

Alot of times they get injured trying to avoid the injury rather than just running hard.

b

[/ QUOTE ]

dunno if anyone called this out, but this is just dumb and untrue in regards to nfl players.

[/ QUOTE ]

It was a general statement about someone trying to play while conciously trying to avoid injury. People who do that are usually more susceptible to injury.

b
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 11-06-2007, 12:15 AM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Adrian Peterson is not Overrated, statistical comparison CTaylor -

Learning how to not get injured is the only reason Jerome Bettis and Emmitt Smith lasted so long.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 11-06-2007, 12:22 AM
bernie bernie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Muckleshoot! Usually rebuying.
Posts: 15,163
Default Re: Adrian Peterson is not Overrated, statistical comparison CTaylor -

[ QUOTE ]
Learning how to not get injured is the only reason Jerome Bettis and Emmitt Smith lasted so long.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not what I'm talking about.

b
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 11-06-2007, 12:58 AM
vhawk01 vhawk01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GHoFFANMWYD
Posts: 9,098
Default Re: Adrian Peterson is not Overrated, statistical comparison CTaylor -

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Watching him in college left me with a large man crush on Reggie Bush.

I think Peterson is a MUCH better back for the pro game. However, he needs to run with more care for his body, or he's going to miss a fuckload of games.

[/ QUOTE ]

Injuries happen to all RBs. Avoiding the hits is obviously a useful skill but eventually injuries will happen to everybody. You can only hope its not too serious such as an ACL.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, everybody gets hurt. Some people get hurt a lot more than others because they insist on jumping around and throwing themselves into people without any regard for their own goodwill.

[/ QUOTE ]

Alot of times they get injured trying to avoid the injury rather than just running hard.

b

[/ QUOTE ]

dunno if anyone called this out, but this is just dumb and untrue in regards to nfl players.

[/ QUOTE ]

It was a general statement about someone trying to play while conciously trying to avoid injury. People who do that are usually more susceptible to injury.

b

[/ QUOTE ]

This seems like one of those things that people say because it sounds poetic but when you stop and think about it for 5 seconds you realize its asinine and you could not possibly know if its true, nor have any real reason to expect it IS true. I mean, most of the same people who parrot this are the guys saying AP is going to get hurt because he runs so hard and doesnt worry about contact (I understand that you arent saying both).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.