Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > About the Forums
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Who should go to jail longer?
The three guys who tried to dig up her corpse and have sex with it 18 19.35%
Her boyfriend who lost control of the motorcycle while drunk, speeding and not having her wear a helmet 75 80.65%
Voters: 93. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 08-15-2007, 06:48 PM
stabn stabn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: eatin ur taco
Posts: 9,680
Default Re: Mudslinging, Personal Attacks, and Unsubstantiated Accusations For

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hi Everyone:

This forum will not happen.

www.twoplustwo.com is a site that was and is built on content and professionalism. Obviously, I'm aware that is not always the case with some of our posts and threads, but we only encourage our posters to think in terms of quality, we do not require it. On the otherhand, I believe it would be a major mistake for us to have a forum where the idea of quality content and professionalism is rejected by Two Plus Two management. So again, it will not happen.

Best wishes,

Mason Malmuth

[/ QUOTE ]

So OOT and BBV4L will be dismantled and NT banished for life?

[/ QUOTE ]


Hi pvn,

Those forums were created for content and profressionalism. We allow are users a bit of leeway but encourage them to think in terms of quality.

stabn M
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 08-15-2007, 07:52 PM
benza13 benza13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Building stacks, then blowing them up
Posts: 5,932
Default Re: Mudslinging, Personal Attacks, and Unsubstantiated Accusations For

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hi Everyone:

This forum will not happen.

www.twoplustwo.com is a site that was and is built on content and professionalism. Obviously, I'm aware that is not always the case with some of our posts and threads, but we only encourage our posters to think in terms of quality, we do not require it. On the otherhand, I believe it would be a major mistake for us to have a forum where the idea of quality content and professionalism is rejected by Two Plus Two management. So again, it will not happen.

Best wishes,

Mason Malmuth

[/ QUOTE ]

So OOT and BBV4L will be dismantled and NT banished for life?

[/ QUOTE ]


Hi pvn,

Those forums were created for content and profressionalism. We allow are users a bit of leeway but encourage them to think in terms of quality.

stabn M

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay, OOT maybe, but one of the original names tossed around for BBV4L was The Toilet, clearly no content was ever intended for such a place.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 08-15-2007, 09:53 PM
2/325Falcon 2/325Falcon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,952
Default Re: Mudslinging, Personal Attacks, and Unsubstantiated Accusations For

So does Bizzaro OOT have a Hater forum? I may have to take my OH SNAP! business elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 08-16-2007, 06:24 AM
Mike Haven Mike Haven is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Zoo, ATF, EB, etc
Posts: 7,043
Default Re: Mudslinging, Personal Attacks, and Unsubstantiated Accusations For

Thank you.

I have read all the pro and anti posts in this thread and, albeit somewhat reluctantly, I feel obliged that because many of us regard this site in entirety to be a site mainly chock-full of well thought out and professional content, I have to come to the considered decision that the subject forum must not happen.

Obviously there are some posts which do not meet the highest of standards, I'll admit, but it is the job of the rest of us to educate the relevant posters; and to have a forum dedicated to bring out the worst in us could have the opposite to the desired effect, and drive the mainstay of content into an ever-decreasing spiral of quality, downwards.

In conclusion, [censored] the lot of you.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 08-16-2007, 06:37 AM
Bobo Fett Bobo Fett is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canada, Eh!
Posts: 3,283
Default Re: Mudslinging, Personal Attacks, and Unsubstantiated Accusations For

[ QUOTE ]
In conclusion, [censored] the lot of you.

[/ QUOTE ]
Wow, what a [censored] [censored].
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 08-16-2007, 09:14 PM
2/325Falcon 2/325Falcon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,952
Default Re: Mudslinging, Personal Attacks, and Unsubstantiated Accusations For

[ QUOTE ]
In conclusion, [censored] the lot of you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 08-17-2007, 08:49 PM
Myrtle Myrtle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,100
Default Re: Mudslinging, Personal Attacks, and Unsubstantiated Accusations For

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I was born to mod this forum, but I just want to be shadow mod of OOT.

Mat, NT, can I just have the power to lock bad threads? I don't want to be green.

[/ QUOTE ]


You're just another idiot who actually was born to be the butt of insults from your betters like me. And you're a pussy too because you didn't accept my debate challenge some months back. If this new forum comes to pass, with a laissez faire mod like pvn instead of some Caspar Milquetoast, you will be covered in mud and [censored] every day of the year there.

[/ QUOTE ]

Some of my colleagues recommended that I write a letter about how Barf This's attitudes smack of Jacobinism. This is that letter. I realize that some of you may not know the particular background details of the events I'm referring to. I'm not going to go into those details here, but you can read up on them elsewhere.

Viewed from all angles, there is still hope for our society, real hope -- not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of the worst types of rude self-promoters there are, but the hope that makes you eager to rise to the challenge of thwarting his overbearing plans. Careerism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's Barf's favorite; it makes it easy for him to force his moral code on the rest of us. Barf receives most of his knowledge from "Revisionism for Dummies", as evidenced by the way that there are those who are informed and educated about the evils of pessimism, and there are those who are not. Barf is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that's why his army of sick bloodsuckers appears to be growing in number. I honestly pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction yet I keep reminding myself that he wants all of us to believe that censorship could benefit us. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. Hey, it's not my fault that Barf really struck a nerve with me when he said that he has achieved sainthood. That lie is a painful reminder that Barf's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to force us to adopt rigid social roles that compromise our inner code of ethics.

While I don't know Barf's secret plans, I do know that Barf's statements such as "Barf's way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual. As part of his efforts to gain a mainstream following, Barf publishes the Journal of Clueless Exhibitionism. Included alongside articles discussing history, culture, art, religion, and philosophy are endorsements of Barf's plans to destabilize the already volatile social fabric that he purportedly aims to save.

What we have been imparting to Barf -- or what he has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge. He asserts that he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic pink pixie dust over everything that he considers aberrent or stolid. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence.

My mother always told me, "If you don't have something intelligent to say, just keep quiet." Apparently, Barf's mother never told him that. Foolish flag burners don't really want me to get us out of the hammerlock that Barf is holding us in, although, of course, they all have to pay lip service to the idea. Take it from me: I overheard one of his apostles say, "We're supposed to shut up and smile when Barf says unrestrained, pompous things." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to stand up and fight for our heritage, traditions, and values.

If Barf were paying attention -- which it would seem he is not, as I've already gone over this -- he'd see that he says that some people deserve to feel safe while others do not. What balderdash! What impudence! What treachery! Truth be told, he likes to compare his obiter dicta to those that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. What I want to document now is that Barf wants us to believe that his circulars are Right with a capital R. How stupid does he think we are? If I'm not horribly mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how he has a deficiency of real goals. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also grant people the freedom to pursue any endeavor they deem fitting to their skills, talent, and interest.

I don't have time to go into this in as much detail as I should, but Barf's manifestos will have consequences -- very serious consequences. And we ought to begin doing something about that. I have begged Barf's confreres to step forth and wage war on ageism. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Barf might retaliate? To help answer that question I will offer a single anecdote. A few weeks ago, I overheard some fickle Philistine tell everyone who passed by that statism is the key to world peace. Astounded, I asked this person if he realized that perusing the membership of Barf's cabal is like taking a tour of Dick Tracy's Rogue's Gallery. Not only was his answer "no" but it was also news to him that throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to take off the kid gloves and vent some real anger at Barf and those who wish to commit acts of immorality, dishonesty, and treason. Naturally, Barf belongs to the latter category. From this perspective, he thinks that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. However, he makes free and liberal use of chicanery, deceit, intolerance, lust, persecution, and oppression.

Just because I understand Barf's conclusions doesn't mean I agree with them. Do I want Barf to intensify or perpetuate chauvinism? No, thank you very much; I would much rather introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on Barf's dissolute invectives. While you or I might find it natural to want to enable patriots to use their freedoms to save their freedoms, the only thing bigger than the chip on Barf's shoulder is the grossness of his sound bites. That's the current situation, and if you have any doubt about the reality of it, then you haven't been paying close enough attention to what's been happening in the world.

When I first heard about Barf's drug-induced ravings, I didn't know whether to laugh, because Barf's smears are so unprofessional, or cry, because Barf keeps trying to sanctify his depravity. And if we don't remain eternally vigilant, he will undoubtedly succeed. No one that I speak with or correspond with is happy about this situation. Of course, I don't speak or correspond with reckless lugs, Barf's foot soldiers, or anyone else who fails to realize that Barf is clearly up to something. I don't know exactly what, but the best thing about him is the way that he encourages us to protect little children from dysfunctional, intransigent oligarchs like him. No, wait; Barf doesn't encourage that. On the contrary, he discourages us from admitting that my long-term goal is to summon up the courage to reveal the nature and activity of his functionaries and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims. Unfortunately, much remains to be done. As you may have noticed, I want to make this clear, so that those who do not understand deeper messages embedded within sarcastic irony -- and you know who I'm referring to -- can process my point. In order to understand the motivation behind Barf's allegations, it is important first to build a society in which people have a sense of permanence and stability, not chaos and uncertainty. Barf is the lineal descendant of the hell-raisers who nailed Jesus to the cross. In that context, one could say that Barf's mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life.

Someone has been giving Barf's brain a very thorough washing, and now Barf is trying to do the same to us. There is a problem here. A very large, scummy, execrable problem. Now that this letter has come to an end, let me remind you that it was intended to provide an accurate, even-handed, and balanced discussion of Barf This and his diatribes. Please do not contact me with insults, death threats, or the like, because I will ignore them. If you disagree with my arguments or can provide further information about Barf, please contact me and I will endeavor to make any necessary corrections to this letter.

In other words, eat [censored] and bark at the moon you lame-brained mother-[censored] [censored] - sucker!
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 08-17-2007, 09:24 PM
Ron Burgundy Ron Burgundy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ronpaul2008.com
Posts: 5,208
Default Re: Mudslinging, Personal Attacks, and Unsubstantiated Accusations For

This thread made me giggle like a little girl.

Then Mason "buzzkill" Malmuth had to step in and ruin it.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 08-17-2007, 09:30 PM
Myrtle Myrtle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,100
Default Re: Mudslinging, Personal Attacks, and Unsubstantiated Accusations For

[ QUOTE ]
This thread made me giggle like a little girl.

Then Mason "buzzkill" Malmuth had to step in and ruin it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Although I generally believe that the less said about Mason 'Buzzkill" Malmuth, the better, I do feel obligated to say a few things about Mason 'Buzzkill"'s complacent views. Please note that many of the conclusions I'm about to draw are based on cogent and virtually incontrovertible evidence provided by a set of people who have suffered immensely on account of Mason 'Buzzkill". Wherever you look, you'll see him enforcing intolerance in the name of tolerance. You'll see him suppressing freedom in the name of freedom. And you'll see him crushing diversity of opinion in the name of diversity. His slogans serve as a stepping stone to world government. And who will compose that world government? A ruling class consisting of obnoxious loan sharks and gutless poseurs.

Mason 'Buzzkill" just reported that the sun rises just for him. Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on Mason 'Buzzkill"'s part? I don't. I think that it's a deliberate attempt to destroy the lives of good, honest people. We find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that it is aberrant to question his inclinations. This belief is due to a basic confusion, which can be cleared up simply by stating that Mason 'Buzzkill"'s faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. Well, let's get our facts straight. I once overheard Mason 'Buzzkill" say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? Mason 'Buzzkill" said that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to blow the whole situation way out of proportion. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that insensate and wild, his tracts resemble a dilapidated shed. Kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will collapse, proving my claim that I do not have the time, in one sitting, to go into the long answer as to why the final product of Mason 'Buzzkill"'s expostulations will be a dysfunctional society, wherein every natural self-defense mechanism has been short-circuited in some garrulous effort to gain short-term financial benefits. But the short answer is that his policies are not pedantic treatises expressing theories or extravaganzas dealing in fables or fancies. They are substantial, sober outpourings from the very soul of antagonism.

Mason 'Buzzkill"'s opuscula are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're thoroughly nugatory, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, Mason 'Buzzkill"'s most progressive idea is to insist that our society be infested with jingoism, racialism, cameralism, and an impressive swarm of other "isms". If that sounds progressive to you, you must be facing the wrong way. Mason 'Buzzkill" accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is he who is filled with hate. And he accuses me of being bigoted, while his theatrics show nothing but bigotry. Why does Mason 'Buzzkill" make those sorts of accusations, then? Well, I'm sure Mason 'Buzzkill" would rather flush all my hopes and dreams down the toilet than answer that particular question. It must be pointed out over and over again to his forces and, in a broader sense, to wayward doofuses that I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how expansionism is dangerous. Mason 'Buzzkill"'s beer-guzzling version of it is doubly so.

I can repeat with undiminished conviction something I said eons ago: If Mason 'Buzzkill" wants to con us into believing that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy, let him wear the opprobrium of that decision. So, what am I doing about that? I'm educating. I'm trying to expand people's understanding of his hypocritical ruses. It really bothers Mason 'Buzzkill" when people don't obey him. To be more pedantic about it, several things Mason 'Buzzkill" has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like him.

I've known some losers who were impressively rambunctious. However, Mason 'Buzzkill" is mendacious, and that trumps rambunctious every time. I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that he is up to, the more shocking things, things like how he wants to develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to criticize his editorials publically for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but if one believes statements like, "People prefer 'cultural integrity' and 'multicultural sensitivity' to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life," one is, in effect, supporting obtrusive vagrants. Even when Mason 'Buzzkill" isn't lying, he's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to twist the truth. His ploys cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that ophidian, homicidal flibbertigibbets and the worst sorts of noxious yahoos there are should rule this country. I have one final message for you before ending this letter: It breaks my heart and fills my chest with agonizing pain when I see Mason 'Buzzkill" Malmuth use organized violence to suppress opposition. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 08-17-2007, 09:35 PM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: I can hold my breath longer than the Boob
Posts: 10,311
Default Re: Mudslinging, Personal Attacks, and Unsubstantiated Accusations For

Turdle,

That crack pipe is a hell of a thing to get attached to isn't it?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.