#1311
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Soprano\'s: All in the Family Game Thread
Zurvan, I agree with your position and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
DUSTIN GETS WHACKED |
#1312
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Soprano\'s: All in the Family Game Thread
Zurvan,
you're whole argument is [censored] because I've been defending Siegmund all game and you've been pushing him. But the logic was good and you [censored] voting him yesterday along with most everybody else |
#1313
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Soprano\'s: All in the Family Game Thread
Guys,
I've just finished running the numbers. Here are the facts: Today, it's either: 8 vs 6 (Adriana unconverted) or 7 vs 7 (Adriana converted) Both with a good vote buyer out there. Say we whack a wolf (non-roleblocker) today, They kill our other Angel tonight (role block and then kill) We whack another wolf tomorrow, they kill an unknown vill Next day, we whack another wolf, they kill until GVB is dead There are not that many unknowns out there. The wolves will have perfect information. Adriana, if not converted WILL become converted through 100% coverage. Actually it doesn't matter... The wolves can NK her for fun after they run out of Power and vanilla villagers... At this point, we will be at: 3 or 4 non power-vill vs 3 or 4 wolves And the game is OVER. We can't just kill a wolf today. We NEED to kill the roleblocker wolf and hope that when the wolves try to kill the angel, they fail!!! AND we have to be perfect with our whacks. THIS IS WORST THAN A MUST LYNCH SCENERIO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The wolves don't need to block Tony anymore because he can no longer help us. |
#1314
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Soprano\'s: All in the Family Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Zurvan, you're whole argument is [censored] because I've been defending Siegmund all game and you've been pushing him. But the logic was good and you [censored] voting him yesterday along with most everybody else [/ QUOTE ] You defended & condemned him in the same post. Same sentence, even. I think you missed the poitn of my post. As wolves have been known to do. |
#1315
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Soprano\'s: All in the Family Game Thread
and btw- I wasnt the only one saying stuff like that either- dmk earlier in the day tried to question the logic Mark used on Siegmund
|
#1316
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Soprano\'s: All in the Family Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Zurvan, you're whole argument is [censored] because I've been defending Siegmund all game and you've been pushing him. But the logic was good and you [censored] voting him yesterday along with most everybody else [/ QUOTE ] You defended & condemned him in the same post. Same sentence, even. I think you missed the poitn of my post. As wolves have been known to do. [/ QUOTE ] I never voted for Siegmund at any point yesterday- I pointed out the way it was what is the problem what that? on tone I thought he was village, like I thought the whole game- but the logic was sound- sound enough for you to vote him- wtf am I supposed to do at that point- say, "I guess I cant read Siegmund after all hes definitely evil" ?? you're making up [censored] reasons to vote me because you've had blinders on from the beginning |
#1317
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Soprano\'s: All in the Family Game Thread
Dustin, let's try this again. It has nothing to do with Siegmund, per se.
It's the fact that you're: a) defending a villager that was almost certainly going to be lynched b) leaving an option to vote him later, if you have to c) Making a totally non-commital post with a lot of words |
#1318
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Soprano\'s: All in the Family Game Thread
[0] ASPoker
[0] Boiler voted for eskimo [0] Books [0] DMK voted for eskimo <font color="red"> [3] Dustin </font> [2] Eskimo voted for dustin [0] FCBL voted for dustin [0] Herbie [1] Iron Yuppie [0] Krupa [0] Mark [0] Neil voted for iron yuppie [0] Siegmund [0] Zurvan voted for dustin |
#1319
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Soprano\'s: All in the Family Game Thread
d) a totally non-commital post that didn't need to be made, even.
|
#1320
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Soprano\'s: All in the Family Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Dustin, let's try this again. It has nothing to do with Siegmund, per se. It's the fact that you're: a) defending a villager that was almost certainly going to be lynched b) leaving an option to vote him later, if you have to c) Making a totally non-commital post with a lot of words [/ QUOTE ] I HAD BEEN DEFENDING SIEGMUND AGAINST YOU THE WHOLE [censored] GAME I never said I was voting Siegmund- I said the logic was good- AND YOU KNOW IT WAS GOOD. I was pointing out the way it was with Siegmund- Did you even ever go and read Pog v Mods or ASXII or am I the only one who actually looks at old games? |
|
|