|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What is your age? | |||
| 0-22 |
   
|
84 | 35.59% |
| 23-26 |
  
|
61 | 25.85% |
| 27-30 |
  
|
32 | 13.56% |
| 30-34 |
  
|
27 | 11.44% |
| 35+ |
  
|
32 | 13.56% |
| Voters: 236. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1293
10-12-2007, 07:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official October Thread: General Discussion
no, really - I think its good poker to shoved a naked flush draw after a bet and raise - in which one player (effectively) has 1/3 of his stack in. It works out nicely, b/c you do have 7 clean outs, and you also have the power to avoid the board pairing!
|
|
#1294
10-12-2007, 07:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official October Thread: General Discussion
[ QUOTE ]
no, really - I think its good poker to shoved a naked flush draw after a bet and raise - in which one player (effectively) has 1/3 of his stack in. It works out nicely, b/c you do have 7 clean outs, and you also have the power to avoid the board pairing! [/ QUOTE ] LOL you must have a set everytime! Pushing a nut flush draw is pretty standard at 5-10 nowdays |
|
#1295
10-12-2007, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official October Thread: General Discussion
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Hey Dean how much did you make from getting Bryce's action? And did BZ have a piece too? The graph I saw was [censored] sick. [/ QUOTE ] Where is this graph? Who told you I have action? [/ QUOTE ] Bryce posted a graph/skype convo on stoxpoker forums. [/ QUOTE ] I actually made a bit of a snafu in posting that without checking in with Dean and partner for explicit permission. I've talked with Dean and luckily it's a non-issue there, but figured a public "whoops, sorry for not considering that" by way of apology was appropriate here. |
|
#1296
10-12-2007, 07:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official October Thread: General Discussion
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] no, really - I think its good poker to shoved a naked flush draw after a bet and raise - in which one player (effectively) has 1/3 of his stack in. It works out nicely, b/c you do have 7 clean outs, and you also have the power to avoid the board pairing! [/ QUOTE ] LOL you must have a set everytime! Pushing a nut flush draw is pretty standard at 5-10 nowdays [/ QUOTE ] Not all of us are up "80" buyins at 5-10...but if you could be so kind to explain how its profitable to shove a naked flush draw over a bet AND a raise - when the raiser has a third of what your shove would be already in the pot, it'd be appreciated. |
|
#1297
10-12-2007, 07:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official October Thread: General Discussion
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] no, really - I think its good poker to shoved a naked flush draw after a bet and raise - in which one player (effectively) has 1/3 of his stack in. It works out nicely, b/c you do have 7 clean outs, and you also have the power to avoid the board pairing! [/ QUOTE ] LOL you must have a set everytime! Pushing a nut flush draw is pretty standard at 5-10 nowdays [/ QUOTE ] do you even know the hand they are referring to? |
|
#1298
10-12-2007, 07:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official October Thread: General Discussion
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] My roomate bought the new Professional NL book, so I read it and I must say that I am very dissapointed. Anyone else here read it? [/ QUOTE ] Matthew, I had debated buying it but heard that it was not very good for anyone beating small stakes and up. I'm thinking if Bobbo get's his book published it will be the only decent book on the market for midstakes+ NL. [/ QUOTE ] snowbank, PNL1 was not written for the current $2-$4 and up online games. for example, we talk in great detail about planning around commitment, but in 100bb online games you don't plan most hands around commitment. you plan for stealing if you miss / play small to medium pot if hit / commit if hit big. sorry but that's how the volumes split out. PNL2 however has a lot in it for your games. btw to Matthew yes, you can use planning around commitment very effectively in live games, especially loose capped games. Bobbo sorry man! be picky about who publishes it. and you never know what might happen next year or when an opening at 2+2 might come up. matt |
|
#1299
10-12-2007, 07:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official October Thread: General Discussion
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] no, really - I think its good poker to shoved a naked flush draw after a bet and raise - in which one player (effectively) has 1/3 of his stack in. It works out nicely, b/c you do have 7 clean outs, and you also have the power to avoid the board pairing! [/ QUOTE ] LOL you must have a set everytime! Pushing a nut flush draw is pretty standard at 5-10 nowdays [/ QUOTE ] LOL you must have a set everytime! Pushing a any flush draw is pretty standard at no-limit [pun intended] nowdays |
|
#1300
10-12-2007, 08:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official October Thread: General Discussion
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Hey Dean how much did you make from getting Bryce's action? And did BZ have a piece too? The graph I saw was [censored] sick. [/ QUOTE ] Where is this graph? Who told you I have action? [/ QUOTE ] Bryce posted a graph/skype convo on stoxpoker forums. [/ QUOTE ] I actually made a bit of a snafu in posting that without checking in with Dean and partner for explicit permission. I've talked with Dean and luckily it's a non-issue there, but figured a public "whoops, sorry for not considering that" by way of apology was appropriate here. [/ QUOTE ] If you give me 1k ill forgive you. |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
