|
|
#121
09-03-2007, 06:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: fun times with POS ratholers
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] One last post from me on this fkin shortstacking debacle since it's just growing really annoying now that people just refuse to understand the math. I CANNOT ADJUST TO BOTH FULLSTACKS AND SHORTSTACKS AT THE SAME TIME; YOU CAN ONLY DECIDE WHICH YOU DO NOT WANT TO LOSE TO, THERE IS NO POSSIBLE RANGE THAT WORKS AGAINST BOTH, SO STOP SAYING PEOPLE JUST SUCK AT ADJUSTING WHEN IT IS IN FACT IMPOSSIBLE [FOR ME] TO DO SO. [/ QUOTE ] project much? Some might think it's more probable that you're doing something suboptimally on the poker tables. [/ QUOTE ] im actually not big on ppl being dicks to shortstacks but you're wrong here. 
|
|
#122
09-03-2007, 06:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fun times with POS ratholers
[ QUOTE ]
What you are doing clearly isn't against any rules or TOS for online poker sites. I just think it's unethical. For example, I wouldn't buy in for 2 BB in a big stakes online PLO game if it would allow me, despite it being a great spot for my money. There are more important things to me than money. [/ QUOTE ] What you've basically done is 'created' your own code of what is ethical and what isn't. If the rules of a poker site that say I may buy in for a minimum amount, and leave whenever I please, then I am doing nothing wrong. The full stacker's argument just reeks of pathetic desperation now that someone has found a better strategy than the one you are employing. BTW: Buying in for 2 BBs would be akin to throwing away money if you were forced to post a BB. Try again pls.
|
|
#123
09-03-2007, 06:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fun times with POS ratholers
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] One last post from me on this fkin shortstacking debacle since it's just growing really annoying now that people just refuse to understand the math. I CANNOT ADJUST TO BOTH FULLSTACKS AND SHORTSTACKS AT THE SAME TIME; YOU CAN ONLY DECIDE WHICH YOU DO NOT WANT TO LOSE TO, THERE IS NO POSSIBLE RANGE THAT WORKS AGAINST BOTH, SO STOP SAYING PEOPLE JUST SUCK AT ADJUSTING WHEN IT IS IN FACT IMPOSSIBLE [FOR ME] TO DO SO. [/ QUOTE ] project much? Some might think it's more probable that you're doing something suboptimally on the poker tables. [/ QUOTE ] im actually not big on ppl being dicks to shortstacks but you're wrong here. [/ QUOTE ] LOL NO UR WHEY MORE WRONG PERIOD
|
|
#124
09-03-2007, 06:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fun times with POS ratholers
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] One last post from me on this fkin shortstacking debacle since it's just growing really annoying now that people just refuse to understand the math. I CANNOT ADJUST TO BOTH FULLSTACKS AND SHORTSTACKS AT THE SAME TIME; YOU CAN ONLY DECIDE WHICH YOU DO NOT WANT TO LOSE TO, THERE IS NO POSSIBLE RANGE THAT WORKS AGAINST BOTH, SO STOP SAYING PEOPLE JUST SUCK AT ADJUSTING WHEN IT IS IN FACT IMPOSSIBLE [FOR ME] TO DO SO. [/ QUOTE ] project much? Some might think it's more probable that you're doing something suboptimally on the poker tables. [/ QUOTE ] High and mighty much? You don't understand the first thing about poker, and if you continue to SS you'll never come close to understanding the game at the level MDMAA does.
|
|
#125
09-03-2007, 06:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fun times with POS ratholers
Yes I have created my own code of what is ethical. My code of ethics is based on my own personal feelings of right and wrong, and not just what is explicitly laid out to be "the rules".
Is your personal code of ethics really so simple? If so, you have the ethical code of a 9 year old. Also, being able to buy in for 2 BB in an aggressive high stakes PLO game would be hugely +EV because you always see the river when you play a hand.
|
|
#126
09-03-2007, 06:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fun times with POS ratholers
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] What you are doing clearly isn't against any rules or TOS for online poker sites. I just think it's unethical. For example, I wouldn't buy in for 2 BB in a big stakes online PLO game if it would allow me, despite it being a great spot for my money. There are more important things to me than money. [/ QUOTE ] What you've basically done is 'created' your own code of what is ethical and what isn't. If the rules of a poker site that say I may buy in for a minimum amount, and leave whenever I please, then I am doing nothing wrong. The full stacker's argument just reeks of pathetic desperation now that someone has found a better strategy than the one you are employing. BTW: Buying in for 2 BBs would be akin to throwing away money if you were forced to post a BB. Try again pls. [/ QUOTE ] yeah its pretty clear you dont really know much about poker.
|
|
#127
09-03-2007, 06:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fun times with POS ratholers
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] What you are doing clearly isn't against any rules or TOS for online poker sites. I just think it's unethical. For example, I wouldn't buy in for 2 BB in a big stakes online PLO game if it would allow me, despite it being a great spot for my money. There are more important things to me than money. [/ QUOTE ] What you've basically done is 'created' your own code of what is ethical and what isn't. If the rules of a poker site that say I may buy in for a minimum amount, and leave whenever I please, then I am doing nothing wrong. The full stacker's argument just reeks of pathetic desperation now that someone has found a better strategy than the one you are employing. BTW: Buying in for 2 BBs would be akin to throwing away money if you were forced to post a BB. Try again pls. [/ QUOTE ] lol you have no idea what you are talking about
|
|
#128
09-03-2007, 06:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fun times with POS ratholers
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] One last post from me on this fkin shortstacking debacle since it's just growing really annoying now that people just refuse to understand the math. YOU CANNOT ADJUST TO BOTH FULLSTACKS AND SHORTSTACKS AT THE SAME TIME; YOU CAN ONLY DECIDE WHICH YOU DO NOT WANT TO LOSE TO, THERE IS NO POSSIBLE RANGE THAT WORKS AGAINST BOTH, SO STOP SAYING PEOPLE JUST SUCK AT ADJUSTING WHEN IT IS IN FACT IMPOSSIBLE TO DO SO. [/ QUOTE ] You're a [censored] idiot. [/ QUOTE ] No, he's right. [/ QUOTE ] Your right. Every hand is with 2 or more opponents there are no isolated decisions. How could I forget that. I've never been in a blind v blind situation.
|
|
#129
09-03-2007, 06:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fun times with POS ratholers
[ QUOTE ]
High and mighty much? You don't understand the first thing about poker, and if you continue to SS you'll never come close to understanding the game at the level MDMAA does. [/ QUOTE ] When you criticize me on anything besides baseless opinion then maybe I'll start listening. Yes, MDMAA clearly is making money hand over fist right now, which explains his mild temperament in this thread. Hope I'm not being leveled.
|
|
#130
09-03-2007, 06:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: fun times with POS ratholers
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] What you are doing clearly isn't against any rules or TOS for online poker sites. I just think it's unethical. For example, I wouldn't buy in for 2 BB in a big stakes online PLO game if it would allow me, despite it being a great spot for my money. There are more important things to me than money. [/ QUOTE ] What you've basically done is 'created' your own code of what is ethical and what isn't. If the rules of a poker site that say I may buy in for a minimum amount, and leave whenever I please, then I am doing nothing wrong. The full stacker's argument just reeks of pathetic desperation now that someone has found a better strategy than the one you are employing. BTW: Buying in for 2 BBs would be akin to throwing away money if you were forced to post a BB. Try again pls. [/ QUOTE ] Unethical and illegal aren't the same. It's like 2nd grade stuff and yet you seem unable to grasp this.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
