|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which team gets the better deal? | |||
| Team A, not even close |
   
|
5 | 45.45% |
| Team A |
  
|
4 | 36.36% |
| Even trade |
  
|
1 | 9.09% |
| Team B |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Team B, not even close |
  
|
1 | 9.09% |
| Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#121
08-13-2007, 04:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Staking LuckyJimm - is this fair?
the fact that you have access to these forums and continue to play awfully assuages all my concerns about people mentioning 2+2 in chat to fish
|
|
#122
08-13-2007, 04:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Staking LuckyJimm - is this fair?
[ QUOTE ]
the fact that you have access to these forums and continue to play awfully assuages all my concerns about people mentioning 2+2 in chat to fish [/ QUOTE ] F the haters What evidence do you have that I play "awfully", any more awfully than you do? All you know is I have the skill to run a small amount into a large amount over a protracted period of time, but then fall victim to lack of bankroll management and tilt control. That might make me a losing player most of the time but it doesn't make me "awful" or mean I don't have a good understanding of the game.
|
|
#124
08-13-2007, 04:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Staking LuckyJimm - is this fair?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] the fact that you have access to these forums and continue to play awfully assuages all my concerns about people mentioning 2+2 in chat to fish [/ QUOTE ] F the haters What evidence do you have that I play "awfully", any more awfully than you do? All you know is I have the skill to run a small amount into a large amount over a protracted period of time, but then fall victim to lack of bankroll management and tilt control. That might make me a losing player most of the time but it doesn't make me "awful" or mean I don't have a good understanding of the game. [/ QUOTE ] you've posted random HHs and you frequently offer commentary on railed hands you post. i don't have to sit and watch a whole session to get a sense of how someone plays.
|
|
#125
08-13-2007, 04:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Staking LuckyJimm - is this fair?
[ QUOTE ]
the fact that you have access to these forums and continue to play awfully assuages all my concerns about people mentioning 2+2 in chat to fish [/ QUOTE ] about 99% of all online poker players are 2+2.
|
|
#126
08-13-2007, 04:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Staking LuckyJimm - is this fair?
[ QUOTE ]
I'd be interested in your opinion on whether it's fair. Should he be getting as much as 50%? Is it in my interest to do this, or am I better off playing with my own money and learning some discipline? [/ QUOTE ] Jim you're, to date, a losing player- someone has offered to stake you, allowing you to both play poker AND eat this week. The terms are more than fair, take them. I always wonder about the mentality of regular losers, this thread has really cleared alot up for me.
|
|
#129
08-13-2007, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Staking LuckyJimm - is this fair?
Jimm, you need gamblers anonymous in a bad way.
|
|
#130
08-13-2007, 05:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Staking LuckyJimm - is this fair?
Jimm,
Playing and railing the big games shouldn't be mutually exclusive, right? I wish you good luck as a player, but I miss your threads as they filled me in on any big action that I missed...
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
