|
|
#121
06-15-2007, 09:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who is Right??? Intense Amanda Bynes Argument
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] spook: Hey dustin, lets bet how much money you have in your wallet. lowball: sure. over or under 85.0000001 dollars? spook: under. lowball: we I have 3 20's, 1 10, 3' fives, and the torn quarter of a dollar bill. So that is more than 85 dollars. spook: but that is only 1/4 of a dollar. ldo i win, the 20 dollar bill isn't a dollar. [/ QUOTE ] this is not a valid argument people dont age in finite increments [/ QUOTE ] But people discuss their ages in finite increments. common vernacular is to use finite increments. integer years. [/ QUOTE ] thats true. But Tokyo specifically used the greater than sign, which is a mathematical symbol, saying "> 21" and this including all ages 21 and up. [/ QUOTE ] I'll also add that BobO specifically said "not more than 21" while Tokyo then said > 21, they then agreed to bet using these terms. what does not more than mean? what does greater than mean? 
|
|
#122
06-15-2007, 09:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who is Right??? Intense Amanda Bynes Argument
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] spook: Hey dustin, lets bet how much money you have in your wallet. lowball: sure. over or under 85.0000001 dollars? spook: under. lowball: we I have 3 20's, 1 10, 3' fives, and the torn quarter of a dollar bill. So that is more than 85 dollars. spook: but that is only 1/4 of a dollar. ldo i win, the 20 dollar bill isn't a dollar. [/ QUOTE ] this is not a valid argument people dont age in finite increments [/ QUOTE ] But people discuss their ages in finite increments. common vernacular is to use finite increments. integer years. [/ QUOTE ] thats true. But Tokyo specifically used the greater than sign, which is a mathematical symbol, saying "> 21" and this including all ages 21 and up. [/ QUOTE ] wtf "> 21" absolutely does NOT mean all ages 21 and up. >4 does not mean all numbers 4 and up.
|
|
#123
06-15-2007, 09:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who is Right??? Intense Amanda Bynes Argument
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] spook: Hey dustin, lets bet how much money you have in your wallet. lowball: sure. over or under 85.0000001 dollars? spook: under. lowball: we I have 3 20's, 1 10, 3' fives, and the torn quarter of a dollar bill. So that is more than 85 dollars. spook: but that is only 1/4 of a dollar. ldo i win, the 20 dollar bill isn't a dollar. [/ QUOTE ] this is not a valid argument people dont age in finite increments [/ QUOTE ] But people discuss their ages in finite increments. common vernacular is to use finite increments. integer years. [/ QUOTE ] thats true. But Tokyo specifically used the greater than sign, which is a mathematical symbol, saying "> 21" and this including all ages 21 and up. [/ QUOTE ] wtf "> 21" absolutely does NOT mean all ages 21 and up. >4 does not mean all numbers 4 and up. [/ QUOTE ] this is true, it doesnt mean exactly 21 but it certainly does mean 21.5
|
|
#125
06-15-2007, 09:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who is Right??? Intense Amanda Bynes Argument
[ QUOTE ]
Past the age of 1 or 2 age is referred to in whole numbers. [/ QUOTE ] I keep hearing this argument and I fail to see the point. 21.5 is not an imaginary number.
|
|
#127
06-15-2007, 09:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who is Right??? Intense Amanda Bynes Argument
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Past the age of 1 or 2 age is referred to in whole numbers. [/ QUOTE ] I keep hearing this argument and I fail to see the point. 21.5 is not an imaginary number. [/ QUOTE ] It is not a rational description of age.
|
|
#130
06-15-2007, 09:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who is Right??? Intense Amanda Bynes Argument
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] why don't you join my turbo about it [/ QUOTE ] I have invited a girl I have no chances of getting with over. So, thanks, but no thanks. I have goals to not achieve. [/ QUOTE ] She's going to stand you up, so you might as well join.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
