Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 12-09-2006, 03:45 PM
Dan. Dan. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The European Phenom
Posts: 3,836
Default Re: Richest 2% hold half of world\'s assets

[ QUOTE ]
Check the first entry under the verb version of "profit"
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/profit

[/ QUOTE ]

I was refering to profit as a surplus above and beyond your costs.

[ QUOTE ]
Are you saying that this is an example of theft but taking Mr. Y's milk and simply giving it to Boy X isn't?(I'm assuming you're in favor of a more socialist society, correct me if I'm wrong).

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't understand the question. Simply stealing it with no one mowing his lawn? That's obviously theft. Where did I suggest it wasn't?

[ QUOTE ]

I thought I'd heard it all, but arguing that capitalism is theft is one for the ages.

[/ QUOTE ]

lmfao. Surely you must be kidding. Where have you been for the past century and a half? There was this guy...Karl Marx...you should look into him. If not him, maybe Friedrich Engels.
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 12-09-2006, 03:48 PM
Vagos Vagos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Relegated to the #2 Seed
Posts: 944
Default Re: Richest 2% hold half of world\'s assets

[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand the question. Simply stealing it with no one mowing his lawn? That's obviously theft. Where did I suggest it wasn't?

[/ QUOTE ]

So I guess you're not in favor of redistributing any wealth? My mistake, I appologize.
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 12-09-2006, 03:52 PM
BCPVP BCPVP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,759
Default Re: Richest 2% hold half of world\'s assets

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
At what point do I begin engaging in theft?

[/ QUOTE ]

In none of those examples did you "profit;" you were simply properly compensated. Say in your mowing example you agree to mow Mr. Y's lawn for a gallon of milk. But you then turn around and tell Boy X that you'll give him half a gallon of milk to mow Mr. Y's lawn, while you do nothing. Now you've robbed Boy X of half a gallon of milk.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a voluntariy agreement between people. Are you saying that this is an example of theft but taking Mr. Y's milk and simply giving it to Boy X isn't?(I'm assuming you're in favor of a more socialist society, correct me if I'm wrong).

I thought I'd heard it all, but arguing that capitalism is theft is one for the ages.

[/ QUOTE ]
He's arguing standard Marxist labor theory of value, IIRC.
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 12-09-2006, 03:54 PM
Vagos Vagos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Relegated to the #2 Seed
Posts: 944
Default Re: Richest 2% hold half of world\'s assets

[ QUOTE ]
lmfao. Surely you must be kidding. Where have you been for the past century and a half? There was this guy...Karl Marx...you should look into him. If not him, maybe Friedrich Engels.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess I just don't understand then. Three people engaged in COMPLETELY voluntary actions for lawn mowing and milk exchange are partaking in theft. I don't see it, I guess I'm just an idiot who hasn't read Marx though.
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 12-09-2006, 03:56 PM
Vagos Vagos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Relegated to the #2 Seed
Posts: 944
Default Re: Richest 2% hold half of world\'s assets

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
At what point do I begin engaging in theft?

[/ QUOTE ]

In none of those examples did you "profit;" you were simply properly compensated. Say in your mowing example you agree to mow Mr. Y's lawn for a gallon of milk. But you then turn around and tell Boy X that you'll give him half a gallon of milk to mow Mr. Y's lawn, while you do nothing. Now you've robbed Boy X of half a gallon of milk.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a voluntariy agreement between people. Are you saying that this is an example of theft but taking Mr. Y's milk and simply giving it to Boy X isn't?(I'm assuming you're in favor of a more socialist society, correct me if I'm wrong).

I thought I'd heard it all, but arguing that capitalism is theft is one for the ages.

[/ QUOTE ]
He's arguing standard Marxist labor theory of value, IIRC.

[/ QUOTE ]

HOGWASH!
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 12-09-2006, 03:56 PM
nietzreznor nietzreznor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: i will find your lost ship...
Posts: 1,395
Default Re: Richest 2% hold half of world\'s assets

[ QUOTE ]
Every parasitic ruling class invents fictional nonsense about why their reign is necessary, and benign. Guess what? It never has been, and certainly isn't now.

[/ QUOTE ]

snowball,

I agree 100%.

If you wouldn't mind commenting (since you said little on this issue in the OP), does this not also apply to the State?
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 12-09-2006, 04:03 PM
Dan. Dan. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The European Phenom
Posts: 3,836
Default Re: Richest 2% hold half of world\'s assets

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
lmfao. Surely you must be kidding. Where have you been for the past century and a half? There was this guy...Karl Marx...you should look into him. If not him, maybe Friedrich Engels.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess I just don't understand then. Three people engaged in COMPLETELY voluntary actions for lawn mowing and milk exchange are partaking in theft. I don't see it, I guess I'm just an idiot who hasn't read Marx though.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, I seemed like an ass here. I just wanted to point out that "capitalism = theft" is nothing new.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 12-09-2006, 04:03 PM
pvn pvn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: back despite popular demand
Posts: 10,955
Default Re: Richest 2% hold half of world\'s assets

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
At what point do I begin engaging in theft?

[/ QUOTE ]

In none of those examples did you "profit;" you were simply properly compensated. Say in your mowing example you agree to mow Mr. Y's lawn for a gallon of milk. But you then turn around and tell Boy X that you'll give him half a gallon of milk to mow Mr. Y's lawn, while you do nothing. Now you've robbed Boy X of half a gallon of milk.

[/ QUOTE ]

I recently changed jobs. The company I now work for paid a fee to an intermediary (i.e. "recruiter"). Did this intermediary "rob" my new employer? After all, my new employer could have done all that work without going to a third party, right?
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 12-09-2006, 04:03 PM
ShakeZula06 ShakeZula06 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: On the train of thought
Posts: 5,848
Default Re: Richest 2% hold half of world\'s assets

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
At what point do I begin engaging in theft?

[/ QUOTE ]

In none of those examples did you "profit;" you were simply properly compensated. Say in your mowing example you agree to mow Mr. Y's lawn for a gallon of milk. But you then turn around and tell Boy X that you'll give him half a gallon of milk to mow Mr. Y's lawn, while you do nothing. Now you've robbed Boy X of half a gallon of milk.

[/ QUOTE ]
Really? Would the boy have a lawn to mow if it wasn't for you? Are real estate agencies stealing when they buy a house and sell it for a higher amount? Is 2p2 stealing when they have ads set up for things they don't own?
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 12-09-2006, 04:09 PM
nietzreznor nietzreznor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: i will find your lost ship...
Posts: 1,395
Default Re: Richest 2% hold half of world\'s assets

[ QUOTE ]
lmfao. Surely you must be kidding. Where have you been for the past century and a half? There was this guy...Karl Marx...you should look into him. If not him, maybe Friedrich Engels.

[/ QUOTE ]

True enough, but there is also a century and a half of marginalist economics that pretty much renders the labor theory of value pretty much moot.

As an aside, I think this whole topic is muddled since there are significant differences in the way people are using the terms "captialism" and "socialism". I think that Marx is right to say that "capitalism is theft" (or at the very least exploitative), if by capitalism we mean something like state-sponsorship of business--i.e., corporate capitalism, which is essentially what we have in this country.

But Marx (along with many socislists) had a bad a habit of confusing exploitative capitalism with free markets and voluntary exchange--they aren't the same thing, and many times arguments designed to show the failure of a specific economy are then fallaciously applied to free markets.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.