#121
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TLK banned for collusion?
wow sarcasm is funny
|
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TLK banned for collusion?
did u say 110% rakeback?
|
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TLK banned for collusion?
Contrary to popular belief this stopped being funny toward the end of page 1(I use hella big pages)
Was he actually banned? Does anyone know? |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TLK banned for collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] On a more serious note, HU colluding is a HUGE problem in the lower limits. In my naive days I lost a lot of money from this. I would rail these two guys and see player B get the worst beats over and over, it was absurd. I ended up just feeling to bad for the guy I kept transfering him money. 4 months and $600 later I discover they've been faking the whole time and splitting my money. [/ QUOTE ] Let's go play headsup: You purposely continually lose to me, then I'll pretend I have to go to the doctor's or something, and whoever has been watching will think you're an idiot and thus donate their money to you. I'll transfer you your money back later. [/ QUOTE ] I 12th leveled you ! |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TLK banned for collusion?
In other news:
TLK's ex-wife has now has brought him to court, stating "My alimony needs to include this collusion money. It is obvious that this has been a large portion of his income and i am entitled to half of it." She thanks you all for bringing this to her attention. |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TLK banned for collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
I 12th leveled you ! [/ QUOTE ] This thread has given me a headache. Is that the 13th level? |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TLK banned for collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
First this, next checkers, then chess, when will it all end? [/ QUOTE ] monopoly and then scrabble... maybe even connect four. |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TLK banned for collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] First this, next checkers, then chess, when will it all end? [/ QUOTE ] monopoly and then scrabble... maybe even connect four. [/ QUOTE ] connect 4 is certifiably rigged |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TLK banned for collusion?
I dont get you guys, there are some pretty decent poker players on this forum- probably more than Dan Negraneus site and Im sure if this was posted there people would actualy be able to read the facts and not be obsessed with what level sarcasm was getting. People obviously use the 'OMGz Nth level sarcasm' reply when they dont understand whats been said and are to proud to admit it went over there head.
Me, El D, Spechel EDD and a few others have tried to explain it as clearly as possibly but it seems many just dont understand How could it be simpler- colluding heads up gives a huge edge on opponants, up to and beyond 20% in some loose games- the biggest proof of this is the amounts of money won during the Beal games- it always seemed to be Beal wins 6mill, Ivey wins 10mill....they managed to win all this money because they were colluding like animals- do you see why? |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TLK banned for collusion?
This thread should be moved to OOT where *'s can be given to members of the Sarcasm Collusion Ring.
PairTheBoard |
|
|