#121
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
yeah, but its become the accepted way of denoting winrate. Switching it into bb seems like senseless inflation of numbers. [/ QUOTE ] Well, if we Brits can make the change from Imperial to Metric.... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
"How ya doing this month?"
"Meh... just 2 pibb/100 for 50k hands." |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
"How ya doing this month?" "Meh... just 2 pibb/100 for 50k hands." [/ QUOTE ] I'll take a 2pibb/100 winrate. |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
So, it's agreed. piBB/100 is the new standard.
|
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
It's BB/100 (senseless using ptBB when referring to NL- other than it's the PT default.) [/ QUOTE ] I've been saying this forever but no one listens to me. |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's BB/100 (senseless using ptBB when referring to NL- other than it's the PT default.) [/ QUOTE ] I've been saying this forever but no one listens to me. [/ QUOTE ] Here you go: http://www.befrienders.org/ |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] From memory, very few (if any) of the most profitable players have such a high PFR% (at least at $1/$2- I'm not so familiar with $2/$4.) (Also, most of the players that do have a high PFR% are losing players.) [/ QUOTE ] Sorry but I totally disagree with this. [/ QUOTE ] These are the Top 20 earners from the last 800k hands that I've played. [/ QUOTE ] At NL200 and lower, a PFR under 10% is a good way to play. At NL400 and higher limits in full ring, I Think that a PFR over 10% is EV+. |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
you guys are all absolutely wrong. the problem comes from his play in UTG and UTG+1. have a clue. and to the guy with that sample of a million nits, it tells me A)I should play FTP, and B) You probably have those results because the nits have to play more hands due to their [censored] winrates. And is that the standard PTBB? or the one that's just BB/100 cause I know you can change the option in PT and running at 6ptbb playing 20/5 over 800k hands seems blasphemous. In my experience, I don't think 5+ ptbb can be achieved long term without at least 17vpip in full ring at 1/2+... [/ QUOTE ] Yeah his stats are NOT in ptBB/100, they are in big blinds/100. |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
At NL200 and lower, a PFR under 10% is a good way to play. [/ QUOTE ] you can do well, but its leaving a lot of money on the table |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] At NL200 and lower, a PFR under 10% is a good way to play. [/ QUOTE ] you can do well, but its leaving a lot of money on the table [/ QUOTE ] What do you base that opinion on? |
|
|