Another stupid ethics question

[Daliman]

[ QUOTE ]
Dalidonk,

First of all, I have no personal problem with you. I don't search for your posts or anything and I definitely don't avoid your good posts (I'm sure you make some - probably around NL strategy). But you take EVERYTHING waaaaaay too personally. And people with thin skins, on the internet, who insist on defending themselves from the most ridiculous attacks, in the most ridiculous ways, are just ASKING for further ridicule. As anyone will tell you, you bring it on yourself. It's not a coincidence that A LOT of people make fun of you. They are not all jerks. They do not all do it to everyone. THERE IS A REASON. THE REASON IS YOUR BEHAVIOUR.

In any case, in this instance, Cole didn't have to post your name. But he wasn't posting your name in order to ridicule you. If you look at the OP again, you'll see that he posted your name to justify why he was making the post at all. If some rando had been upset, he wouldn't have cared. He only posted the question because you were upset AND HE GAVE WEIGHT TO YOUR OPINION so he wanted to confirm that his view was justified.

And yes you way over-reacted when he refused to go along with your weird ideas. Next time, sit without posting if you want to do something other than play poker. $60 lesson in common sense.

- TWP

[/ QUOTE ]

Now THAT'S funny. Even Yvesaint has said you go out of your way to troll me.

[FoxwoodsFiend]

[ QUOTE ]
But of course, cts is 100% in the RIGHT posting my name about this because, well, because I'm Daliman, 2+2's favorite non-compliant whipping boy.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you're right that cole shouldn't have posted your name, but this is such a slight slight (LOL!) that our failure to condemn him for it is due more to apathy/oversight than it is due to some ingrained favoritism/vendetta against you.

[ QUOTE ]

Also, since it has come up numerous times in this thread, he didn't have 12 games going. He may have been sitting at 12 games, but as I was scoping them all last night, he wasn't playing anyone on a couple, and had games on 5 or 6.

[/ QUOTE ]

It takes a big man to admit being a stalker especially when his image is as shaky as yours is due to this thread.

[TheWorstPlayer]

Is there anyone else I 'troll'? Are there numerous other people who 'troll' you? Is there a logical explanation for this situation? And if you think I search for your posts or anything, sorry to disappoint you. I just read HSNL and BBV and respond to a lot of posts. If some of them are yours (probably because yours are usually easy and enjoyable to make fun of) then so be it. And if we meet in person, I'll happily buy you a beer. I promise I have nothing personal against you. I just think your posts are generally stupid.

[g-p]

you are always wrong

[FoxwoodsFiend]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
LA, just like 90% of the other respondents in this thread, you troll me constantly,

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think making reasonable and normal responses to a post is "trolling". if anything, you troll and we just react.

[/ QUOTE ]

the worst part is that he doesn't just troll the forum - he apparently trolls people, too.

[/ QUOTE ]

Does this mean I'll never get a date with you? I'm somewhat feminine, ( at least more feminine than you....)

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, fslexcduck OWNED!!!!!!!!!!

[/ QUOTE ]
For the record, Vanessa's hot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Have you seen women before?

[/ QUOTE ]

Good job avoiding online confrontation. Definitely won't be that awkward moment when you meet vanessa before you two get drinks and joke around about how big of a jerk you used to be to her!

[Daliman]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Does this mean I'll never get a date with you? I'm somewhat feminine, ( at least more feminine than you....)

[/ QUOTE ]

That comment very seriously sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why? I can be called a douche, a retard, stupid, an idiot and worse, by her and others, but because she happens to be a lesbian, that's out of bounds? How about if she was fat, would THAT be ok? If I happened to have mild down's syndrome, would then calling me a retard be out of bounds?

I guess I missed the day they passed out the book on what is fair in internet insult wars. Please forward me your copy.

[KEWL]

in my very first post i would like to say that as i progress in my poker career i hope my interactions with other players don't seem so painfully high school as this one.

(you SERIOUSLY made a "you look like a man" joke? c'mon)

[yvesaint]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Dalidonk,

First of all, I have no personal problem with you. I don't search for your posts or anything and I definitely don't avoid your good posts (I'm sure you make some - probably around NL strategy). But you take EVERYTHING waaaaaay too personally. And people with thin skins, on the internet, who insist on defending themselves from the most ridiculous attacks, in the most ridiculous ways, are just ASKING for further ridicule. As anyone will tell you, you bring it on yourself. It's not a coincidence that A LOT of people make fun of you. They are not all jerks. They do not all do it to everyone. THERE IS A REASON. THE REASON IS YOUR BEHAVIOUR.

In any case, in this instance, Cole didn't have to post your name. But he wasn't posting your name in order to ridicule you. If you look at the OP again, you'll see that he posted your name to justify why he was making the post at all. If some rando had been upset, he wouldn't have cared. He only posted the question because you were upset AND HE GAVE WEIGHT TO YOUR OPINION so he wanted to confirm that his view was justified.

And yes you way over-reacted when he refused to go along with your weird ideas. Next time, sit without posting if you want to do something other than play poker. $60 lesson in common sense.

- TWP

[/ QUOTE ]

Now THAT'S funny. Even Yvesaint has said you go out of your way to troll me.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol what, where did i say this

(if u find it, yea, ill take this statement back but i cant remember this, o yea, post PMs if necessary)

daliman, u are still overreacting. which makes it even more hilarious, beacuse u take everything so seriously

[FoxwoodsFiend]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Does this mean I'll never get a date with you? I'm somewhat feminine, ( at least more feminine than you....)

[/ QUOTE ]

That comment very seriously sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]


Why? I can be called a douche, a retard, stupid, an idiot and worse, by her and others, but because she happens to be a lesbian, that's out of bounds? How about if she was fat, would THAT be ok? If I happened to have mild down's syndrome, would then calling me a retard be out of bounds?

I guess I missed the day they passed out the book on what is fair in internet insult wars. Please forward me your copy.

[/ QUOTE ]


FWIW, I agree with Daliman that this isn't super [censored] up to say, it just makes him look bad.

[Daliman]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But of course, cts is 100% in the RIGHT posting my name about this because, well, because I'm Daliman, 2+2's favorite non-compliant whipping boy.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you're right that cole shouldn't have posted your name, but this is such a slight slight (LOL!) that our failure to condemn him for it is due more to apathy/oversight than it is due to some ingrained favoritism/vendetta against you.

[ QUOTE ]

Also, since it has come up numerous times in this thread, he didn't have 12 games going. He may have been sitting at 12 games, but as I was scoping them all last night, he wasn't playing anyone on a couple, and had games on 5 or 6.

[/ QUOTE ]

It takes a big man to admit being a stalker especially when his image is as shaky as yours is due to this thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh, I play high stakes poker: some of the same limits he does. I was playing last night. If I happened to see a few idiots in his game, I would have sat down.

Gee, I didn't know all this time that I was scoping games that I was being a stalker. Thank you for elucidating that so well for me.