|
View Poll Results: Do you tan? | |||
Yes | 7 | 16.28% | |
No | 14 | 32.56% | |
No, but my significant other does | 0 | 0% | |
No, but I'd consider it | 4 | 9.30% | |
Tanning is gay, dude | 18 | 41.86% | |
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
keep the antes and add the 150-300/25 level
oh and lower rake ldo |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
|
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
When voting keep in mind that 20 hands per level basically means you're playing 20 minute levels at tight tables.
|
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
plz make it like this:
add 150/300 25a - 10/20, 20/30, 25/50, 50/100, 75/150, 100/200, 100/200 25a, 150/300 25a, 200/400 25a, 300/600 50a Or leave it alone |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
looking at some recent turbos it seems like 7/8 hands per levels early and about 10/11 hands late, turbos have 5 minute blinds.
|
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
plz make it like this: add 150/300 25a - 10/20, 20/30, 25/50, 50/100, 75/150, 100/200, 100/200 25a, 150/300 25a, 200/400 25a, 300/600 50a Or leave it alone [/ QUOTE ] you want a 20/30 level? thats just stupid. 100/200 25a is a bit pointless as well if you use 150/300 25a... |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
Rake is a huge factor.
Also I would introduce a buy in in between 27 and 60 because 35 really doesn't work, how about 45 (41+4)? Also get rid of 100/200 and move directly to 100/200/25 and then 150/300/50 |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
Rake is a huge factor. Also I would introduce a buy in in between 27 and 60 because 35 really doesn't work, how about 45 (41+4)? Also get rid of 100/200 and move directly to 100/200/25 and then 150/300/50 [/ QUOTE ] we hated 32+3 because it had the highest rake of any turbo, the games never ever run more than a few at a time 41+4, are your retarded? (srsly) |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
would be 41+3 luisgallo, 41+4 for a turbo is really bad
|
#130
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
would be 41+3 luisgallo, 41+4 for a turbo is really bad [/ QUOTE ] correct, I just meant to have a buy in in that range, not really bothered in working out the exact rake. Unfortunately I am pretty busy unlike Daleroxxu who is fighting a crusade against me...what a loser! |
|
|