|
View Poll Results: Which do you drink primarily: | |||
N. Coffee | 25 | 58.14% | |
Espresso etc | 3 | 6.98% | |
Girly Coffee | 6 | 13.95% | |
Herbal Tea | 2 | 4.65% | |
Tea (milk..) | 7 | 16.28% | |
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread
Look, the Bears are 1999 STL good, but no team in the current NFL is a favorite to run the table with 11 games left. We shouldn't talk about it just yet.
And the every 20 years argument is BS. |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bears could cruise to 16-0
[ QUOTE ]
I'm a Pats fan and I would almost take a loss if it meant Chicago goes undefeated, just so I wouldn't have to listen to those insufferable 72 Dolpins [/ QUOTE ] I dunno if you'd be gaining much: Go Bears. |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what I have noticed is that the bears tend to win a championship every 20 or so years. THey won in 63, they won in 85, now its 06 so its time for them to do it up again [/ QUOTE ] Were you listening to the Score 670 at 3:45pm today too? They were saying pretty much the same thing. [/ QUOTE ] yea, I did. I must've missed boers and bernstein saying that. Its been something that I think about everynow and then |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bears could cruise to 16-0
[ QUOTE ]
I'm a Pats fan and I would almost take a loss if it meant Chicago goes undefeated, just so I wouldn't have to listen to those insufferable 72 Dolpins [/ QUOTE ] ugh....i still hear about 85....Bears fans would be much worse |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bears could cruise to 16-0
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm a Pats fan and I would almost take a loss if it meant Chicago goes undefeated, just so I wouldn't have to listen to those insufferable 72 Dolpins [/ QUOTE ] ugh....i still hear about 85....Bears fans would be much worse [/ QUOTE ] Nice to see MyTurn2Raise loyally trolling anything Chicago. |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bears could cruise to 16-0
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm a Pats fan and I would almost take a loss if it meant Chicago goes undefeated, just so I wouldn't have to listen to those insufferable 72 Dolpins [/ QUOTE ] I dunno if you'd be gaining much: Go Bears. [/ QUOTE ] hey that team beat the Pats in the SB...I remember them all too well [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Look, the Bears are 1999 STL good, but no team in the current NFL is a favorite to run the table with 11 games left. We shouldn't talk about it just yet. [/ QUOTE ] comparing the Bears to the 99 Rams is really really weird. if you had to make the lines for the Bears for every game right now, they would be big favorites in most of their games, and small favorites in a couple of others. that's all people are saying. now, a couple big injuries could happen, or Grossman could regress or all kinds of things could happen...so going undefeated is a long shot. But, they look like a great team right now with a very easy schedule AND they are my defense in a fantasy league which stresses defense which makes KBZ a GENIUS [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread
If they get through @ NYG @ NYJ @ NE they can play their backups in their last 3 and still go undefeated.
|
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread
The bears in 5 games, have racked up a 120 point differential, second best ever. Guess who's 1st? 1999 STL.
1999 STL is one of the best teams ever. The Bears look like they belong in that caliber. |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread
[ QUOTE ]
The bears in 5 games, have racked up a 120 point differential, second best ever. Guess who's 1st? 1999 STL. 1999 STL is one of the best teams ever. The Bears look like they belong in that caliber. [/ QUOTE ] I was talking about comparing the 2 teams, not comparing the 2 teams point differentials. especially for a franchise that had a dominating team led by an overwhelming defense 20 years ago, bringing up the 99 Rams - who had a track meet offense and quick, effective defense - as a comparison is funny. |
|
|