![]() |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
it was really about the monotony of my omelet. Which I have changed for the better now to use Munster instead of American cheese. This has been a vast upgrade
|
#122
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Chickens are monogamous? Coulda fooled me. [/ QUOTE ] I think he was writing from the point of view of the hen, more than the rooster. But clearly he knows more about chicken society than I do; I'm just guessing. |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
You were the one that messed this whole thread up by not including any content and discussion in your OP. You decided to be a smug douchebag and just write "Discuss". [/ QUOTE ] The idea is very young, too young to survive debate (that's why I sought a discussion). At this early stage, my audience is not people looking for a recipe. I cannot reveal, or even clearly articulate, the mechanisms of this inevitability's execution. And when I can, I won't. Because there will be those with something to lose and they will attempt to do others harm. So the less they know now, the better off we all are. My post was empty because, game-theoretically, it HAD to be. |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You sound like a really fun, down-to-earth guy. We should go out sometime.
|
#125
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
At this early stage, my audience is not people looking for a recipe. I cannot reveal, or even clearly articulate, the mechanisms of this inevitability's execution. And when I can, I won't. Because there will be those with something to lose and they will attempt to do others harm. So the less they know now, the better off we all are. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, ok. You really need to get laid. I'd take FFK up on her offer. Do you loofah? |
![]() |
|
|