Malloreon II: Return of the Rivan King GAME THREAD

[GetThere1Time]

numbers, game theory, blah meowchow. Your guess isn't accurate because players judgements are not taken into account and she also blocks neutral peeks.

[HerbieGRD]

[ QUOTE ]
Beldin: Sorcerer. Power: Obfuscation: He submits a target each night. That person is shielded from peeking by Dark or by Neutrals. He may not shield himself from peeking. If Dark or Neutral tried to peek Beldin’s target, Beldin is notified, but does not learn which team attempted the peek

[/ QUOTE ]
This is what zero claimed for the record - this is pretty much a useless villager. There are at least 4 other good power characters that evils would want dead more than Beldin

[HerbieGRD]

Vote GT1T

[dmk]

i love ice cream, but i haven't had any in a while. i actually have some cookies 'n cream sitting in my freezer at home. i may partake in a bowl tonight.

you guys can have your patton lynch

this is all quite boring right now. i'm not sure why either.

[Nicholasp27]

[ QUOTE ]
numbers, game theory, blah meowchow. Your guess isn't accurate because players judgements are not taken into account and she also blocks neutral peeks.

[/ QUOTE ]

a) this isn't something complicated...the power is WEAK...period

b) they wouldn't mind her blocking neutral peeks...the more peeks shorty gets, the more accurate his info gets, the more he can change the outcome...wolves don't want shorty to know all of them so if village falls behind he can just give up the wolves...so they prolly like that zero can block shorty's peek


i don't care what the actual %s are (notice i said that i'm not doing the math)...all that matters is that the power means NOTHING if zero doesn't block the same player that evil/neutral peek on the same night....and if she does block an evil, it's barely harmful and if she does block a neutral, it may help the evils....


therefore, there is NO WAY the wolves care to kill zero at this point in time

wolves want to do one of three things at night...

a) kill seer first and foremost
b) kill other POWERFUL power roles
c) at least kill someone that seer has peeked

killing zero accomplishes ZERO of those objectives

[shortline99]

i think FCBL is evil and anyone who says otherwise is a liar.

does that mean the village should want to lynch him? maybe.

[shortline99]

nicholas, stop telling us why you didn't kill her already, we get it

[FCBLComish]

Just got home from work and got on. Holy S***. My immediate first thought last night was good, I am not Geran. My immediate first thought this morning was we were screwed, losing Belgarion. After a little reading, I realized that we are not as bad off as we thought, someone else will inherit his role, or most of it anyway. We did lose Eriond earlier.

Anyway, I still do not like GT1T, but since Books is confirmed, and he felt Patton was wolfy, lets start in that direction.

Lynch Patton

I will be taking an afternoon nap today, but will DEFINITELY be awake by 8PM gametime, and on line for the duration of the day.

[Nicholasp27]

dmk is talking in code!

[Zurvan]

Nich

Imagine they have the option of killing Belgarion, with Eriond dead, which (I think) removes the Clemency power, and may or may not remove the villages double vote. Do you think they'd do that instead of looking for a seer who's had one peek, and may not have left any clues at all?

Or have you made a decision, and are going to be so ridiculously stubborn you can't consider alternatives?

I'm also sad that I agree with shorty about FCBL. I have no idea what that means.