Official Party Regulars Thread

[fitnessfreak]

[ QUOTE ]
is smartguy177 busto?

i've seen him at NL200 these days. dood pls move back up

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, i read this post and looked him up on pokertracker.
hand from approx 1 hour ago

***** Hand History for Game 5761134918 *****
$400 NL Texas Hold'em - Monday, March 12, 12:18:23 ET 2007
Table Jackpot #1304207 (Real Money)
Seat 2 is the button
Total number of players : 5
Seat 1: Sanity_Rules ( $197.13 )
Seat 2: en_illervalp ( $801.80 )
Seat 3: krogstrup ( $559.62 )
Seat 6: Smartguy177 ( $1124.06 )
Seat 5: fitboy912 ( $468.60 )
krogstrup posts small blind [$2].
fitboy912 posts big blind [$4].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to fitboy912 [ Ad As ]
Smartguy177 raises [$28]
Sanity_Rules folds.
en_illervalp folds.
>You have options at Jackpot #1304434 (No DP) Table!.
krogstrup calls [$26]
fitboy912 raises [$101]
Smartguy177 calls [$77]
>You have options at Table 127889 Table!.
>You have options at Jackpot #1304434 (No DP) Table!.
e1314 has joined the table.
>You have options at Table 127889 Table!.
krogstrup folds.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 5d, 3h, 2s ]
fitboy912 bets [$195]
Smartguy177 is all-In.
fitboy912 is all-In.
** Dealing Turn ** [ 8c ]
** Dealing River ** [ Kc ]
fitboy912 shows [ Ad, As ]a pair of Aces.
Smartguy177 shows [ Td, Th ]a pair of Tens.
The time at which hand ended:Mar 12 2007 11:20 ET
Smartguy177 wins $655.46 from side pot #1 with a pair of Tens.
fitboy912 wins $962.70 from the main pot with a pair of Aces.

[mj12]

smartguy is pretty bad from what I remember.

[tufat23]

holla, he makes every table fun

[DLizzle]

[ QUOTE ]
I havent played at PP for a while, but will do now. Is it a big difference in competition at the jackpot / non-jackpot tables at 2/4 and 3/6?

[/ QUOTE ]

I notice a difference, especially on weekends and stuff, the jackpot tables are more likely to have complete nutcases

[fitnessfreak]

Can anyone give me an assessment of how the 3/6 and 5/10 games match up against the 2/4 at party. Ive decided to have a few shots at 3/6 on account of my sick good run of late. Just wondering how much harder people find these games to beat, and what are the most notable differences.

fwiw, in my trips up to 3/6 (of which there have been very few admittedly) the games did not appear much different to the 2/4 games. very small sample size as of yet but im interested in some opinions.

[oyvindgee]

I'm playing on 3 bbj tables and one regular. Guess which one I just had quads over quads on... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[GermanWunderkind]

hmmmm tough one - give me more hints

[stigmata]

3/6 is incrementally harder, but not by much. If you beat 2/4 healthily then you will have no problems with 3/6. Just be careful to table select at first, because sometimes they can be full of taggy regulars (some of which have moved down because the bigger games are sucky at that moment). Other tables can be filled with drooling retards.

5/10 on the other hand is a different kettle of fish. In fact, it's not a kettle of fish at all!!!! It's the same 10 regulars constantly 4-betting each other preflop and being a general pain in the ass [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[jkkkk]

Yeah 5/10 really sucks ass, wish I would of made more of an effort to beat it last year.

[kotkis]

5/10 is awesome but 10/20 is rigged as hell.