wolffund vs. Admo $100K Prop Bet

[BowToYourSensei]

wolffund is clearly an infantile retard. admo wins. ship it.

[BowToYourSensei]

[ QUOTE ]
he doesn't have to prove anything, the burden of proof would be on admo.

if someone wanted to bet that i have posted posted on other accounts this year, i'd take the bet, since i haven't.

[/ QUOTE ]

admo probably realizes this, and i'm sure he wouldn't lay 2-1 at these stakes if he couldn't do that.

[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't get why people are hating on wolffund. Assuming he didn't post on multiple accounts, he doesn't have any way to prove that so this is a retarded bet. Admo comes off as a huge dbag imo.

[/ QUOTE ]

Jesus [censored] christ read the thread before you post this crap over and over again. He doesn't need to prove anything, if he didn't post on different accounts, it should be impossible to prove that he did, right? So its free money. Even if he DID post on other accounts it may be impossible and certainly would be very difficult to prove he did, so its +EV no matter what. The fact that he isn't taking it means either he has some sort of fundamental disability and can't understand the terms of the bet (hey, you guys might have that in common! Neither of you can read, perhaps?) or he not only posts on other accounts, but knows there is substantial, obvious evidence of it floating around somewhere. Hate to paint this as such an unflattering dichotomy, but I see no way around it. As others have said, the fact that he's posted on more than one account isn't that big of a deal, the fact that he is going on and on about how he hasn't when its painfully obvious he almost certainly has, is a bit silly.

Either way, none of this has anything to do with Admo. Admo is just trying to make some money, and he, at least, has no problem putting his money where his mouth is. No idea why some of you think Admo is being offensive or childish about any of this. All he has done is been accomodating in pursuit of his mark, and the only 'trash talking' he has done has been to repeatedly assert that he will take the opposite side of a wager. Admo has been nothing but hustler-classy in this entire thread.

[Methodz]

[ QUOTE ]
he doesn't have to prove anything, the burden of proof would be on admo.

if someone wanted to bet that i have posted posted on other accounts this year, i'd take the bet, since i haven't.

[/ QUOTE ]Yeah that's what I don't understand. Admo is laying 2:1, letting wolf pick the panel, not allowed to use IP info, AND provide the evidence proving wolf posts on multiple accounts.

The only reason for wolf not to take the bet would be that he knows admo is right.

[g-p]

[ QUOTE ]
The only reason for wolf not to take the bet would be that he knows admo is right.

[/ QUOTE ]
rofl

[skylar]

double LMAO

[ncpokeresq]

Gotta agree with vhawk on this one. Wolf would know whether he did, and his refusal to take the bet when he gets to sign off on the terms in advance makes it appear that Admo has called him out correctly.
What wolf needs to accept is that when your bluff gets raised, you either reraise or fold. He knows he can't call, but is refusing to fold.
Next hand.

[AllinDan]

this thread is really hard to follow. ~1/5 of the posts in it just say

[ QUOTE ]
*** You are ignoring this user ***

[/ QUOTE ]

[BowToYourSensei]

*** You are ignoring this user ***

[Jiganti]

***You are ignoring this user***