Official March Thread: General Discussion/etc

[TheWorstPlayer]

punter, although this is probably true, over one month I would definitely expect people to run hotter even over 50K-100K samples...

[Josh.]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
biggest winner over a larger sample size seems to be only averaging 5 PT BB/100

[/ QUOTE ]

I doubt anybody but the best players (like CTS) average "ONLY" 5ptBB/100. I would say that anybody over 2.5ptbb is solid regular and anybody over 3.5ptbb is elite player at given stakes.

[/ QUOTE ]


people get a perverted sense of what's possible by all the 30k hand screenshots of people running at 8

[Josh.]

[ QUOTE ]
punter, although this is probably true, over one month I would definitely expect people to run hotter even over 50K-100K samples...

[/ QUOTE ]


that's why he said elite players prob only earn around 3.5

[punter11235]

[ QUOTE ]
punter, although this is probably true, over one month I would definitely expect people to run hotter even over 50K-100K samples...

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I agree with you. Its second screenshot JSnipes posted (thanks again !) and again I am amazed by lack of really big score. I for example run at 8ptbb/100 previous month (20k hands) and I would except similair things happening on Stars. Maybe my games are that softer though...

[ahnuld]

I agree with punter (not because I run at almsot 4 pt/bb long term...for other reasons)

[CopTHIS]

Doesn't virtually everyone on this site claim a lifetime rate of over 5PTBB/100?

[TheWorstPlayer]

not a lifetime rate. a TRUE rate. see, it just gets distorted by the times when I'm tilting and getting sucked out on...

[BobboFitos]

i love dubness sooo much <3 <3

trplhurt.. i feel bad for you

[Jinx]

i don't know about these other fooilios but my lifetime rate has good length and girth

[TheWorstPlayer]

im so happy to see Bri-c getting destroyed. he was nitting up a great table last night and then when the huge fish sat out he instantly sat out too which of course broke the table. jackass.