|
|
#111
03-02-2007, 12:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: vigorish\'s post
mrs vig's explanation is slightly better
[ QUOTE ] Okay Guys, here it is... My daughter's name is Alexandra Danielle. My last name is not Kettering, that's the name of the hospital I go to. I do have cancer called Hemangiopericytoma. Mike and I have had many problems since being diagnosed, and this has been a very difficult time for us. Mike decided to ask the forum for help in our case, though many would disapprove of his decision. It was not explained clearly to me the circumstances of cashouts, and I spoke with him tonight about this. He posted about what is going on in a BBV post that could give you better details. To clarify, I haven't received any of what is still left online. The portion that has been cashed out has been put to good use Thank you again for your understanding and support. Mrs. V [/ QUOTE ] at least there is some information for sleuthing now 
|
|
#113
03-02-2007, 12:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: vigorish\'s post
In a case like this, it would sound much more legit had Vig asked that the donations be sent to the treatment facility to pay the bill of Sarah X directly.
I know that had I needed the money to pay my mastectomy/chemo bills, I would have said that I was getting treatment at Virginia Piper Cancer Center, P.O. Box, Scottsdale, AZ, etc, and instructed donations to be made for the account of Felicia Lee Dyer. I would not have asked anyone to transfer money directly to me on Stars, or send it to my house, Neteller account, etc. See the difference? One sounds so much more shady than the other. Donating to my outstanding balance, especially had I given Virginia Piper permission to publish what my balance was (to make sure the money was going to pay the bill, not a credit on an account that was fully paid, hence coming right back to me in check form), seems so much more legit, IMO. Felicia [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#114
03-02-2007, 12:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: vigorish\'s post
i dont think its a better explanation at all, the fact that she's now clarifying that she has put some to good use and that she only hasnt received any of what's left online is really shady.
|
|
#115
03-02-2007, 12:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: vigorish\'s post
[ QUOTE ]
i dont think its a better explanation at all, the fact that she's now clarifying that she has put some to good use and that she only hasnt received any of what's left online is really shady. [/ QUOTE ] big time. ton of other things too, like saying they met a few days ago yet he hasn't seen the baby in a week. i dunno.. why would he have any excuse to lie whatsoever even about the dumbest small details? more likely when someone is lying they are "slipping up" and dropping inconsistencies by accident.
|
|
#116
03-02-2007, 12:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: vigorish\'s post
It is nice to have you back posting more often felicia.
Vig could reverse all the transfers and the donators could do what felicia said. I would be willing to bet that Vig wouldn't be willing/able to do that, any takers?
|
|
#117
03-02-2007, 01:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: vigorish\'s post
guys,
the reason this is not a scam is because there is ZERO reason for any of these threads to be posted if it was one. they're real people who got into a springer showdown. the end.
|
|
#119
03-02-2007, 01:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: vigorish\'s post
Adanthar,
If Ms Vig is legit sick, but Vig isn't giving her the money, that's scammy. The fact that we likely can't, don't and won't know what's up is just a good reason why threads like this are a bad idea. Giving money to people directly is asking for trouble.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
