![]() |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
drexel not getting in = rip off
|
#112
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yiiikes.
But I think many suspected the Colonial was only going to get 2. Stanford? |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
terrible job this year with only 6 mid-major at large's vs 10 2 years ago and 12 3 years ago. Pathetic.
|
#114
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
63/65 for me. I had Syracuse/Drexel instead of Stanford/Purdue. I don't necessarily agree, but I can't complain too much. Not a bad job altogether by the committee.
|
#115
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
drexel not getting in = rip off [/ QUOTE ] Ripoff totally. MoSt in over Drexel is one thing, but Stanford and Arkansas? Do either of them have road wins like at Nova and at Creighton? |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
62/65 had Cuse, Drexel, K-State, over Stanford, Illinois, Arkansas.
|
#117
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How Arkansas made the field is unfathomable. 7-9 in conference and lost a total of 13 games. No real notable wins.
|
#118
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sometimes the mid-major at-larges just depends on how many obvious ones don't win their conference tourney.
But the Stanford pick is pretty weird. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
do they make Nova and Kentucky play in same bracket every year or is it me?
|
#120
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yeah, Arkansas is weird too.
|
![]() |
|
|