#111
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] this is one sick project. gl. [/ QUOTE ] yea, if you win this, i think we all have to agree its the greatest sng accomplishment ever [/ QUOTE ] I'm gonna assume you're joking, and with absolutely no disrespect to runhot, I figure that 16 tabling... Spacegravy - 25k at 60s - needs almost 80hrs/wk with 7% roi. Runhot- 10k at 27s - needs almost 50hrs/week with 10% roi, or maybe about 43 hours at 9% roi and 20 tabling. Runhot's feat will be awfully impressive if he pulls it out. Spacegravy's feat was completely retarded. Space wins and I don't think it is close. FWIW, I'm pretty sure I could do 10k at the 16s in a month with the right $$$ incentive if I didn't work full time. Sure would love to try it, but I'm sure it would be hell by day 5. GL runhot, this will still be a sick, sick feat. I'm sure you'll pull it off. [/ QUOTE ] so quit your job.. I'm sure many people on here would bet against you. 10% roi 20 tabling is easier said than done too. |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
so quit your job.. I'm sure many people on here would bet against you. 10% roi 20 tabling is easier said than done too. [/ QUOTE ] Lemme see some favorable UIGEA rulings and maybe it'll happen. Also, I'm waiting for my bonus--can't quit before that. As to 10% roi 20 tabling, I'm pretty sure that this is possible even 25+ tabling at the 16s... faq gives 13% as a good multitabling roi for this level, and based on my sharkscoping solid regs + my own small sample, I'd say that this rate is reasonable-- and I have some decent leaks. No clue as to how achievable a 10% roi is by a good but not great player at the 27s playing this high volume, though someone beating the 16s for 13% would actually make more money beating the 27s with an 8% roi-- and a hell of a lot more variance. This is before FPPs. Additionally, if i'm calculating it correctly, a Platinum Star level VIP will generate about $10.85 per set in FPP bucks (FPP value .01593) in a 55 minute set of 27s-- about 5$ more per hour than someone at the 16s. |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
How many 16s regs have 13% ROI or higher?
|
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] so quit your job.. I'm sure many people on here would bet against you. 10% roi 20 tabling is easier said than done too. [/ QUOTE ] Lemme see some favorable UIGEA rulings and maybe it'll happen. Also, I'm waiting for my bonus--can't quit before that. As to 10% roi 20 tabling, I'm pretty sure that this is possible even 25+ tabling at the 16s... faq gives 13% as a good multitabling roi for this level, and based on my sharkscoping solid regs + my own small sample, I'd say that this rate is reasonable-- and I have some decent leaks. No clue as to how achievable a 10% roi is by a good but not great player at the 27s playing this high volume, though someone beating the 16s for 13% would actually make more money beating the 27s with an 8% roi-- and a hell of a lot more variance. This is before FPPs. Additionally, if i'm calculating it correctly, a Platinum Star level VIP will generate about $10.85 per set in FPP bucks (FPP value .01593) in a 55 minute set of 27s-- about 5$ more per hour than someone at the 16s. [/ QUOTE ] for the most part solid regs aren't 20 tabling. What do FPP have to do with anything, that isn't included in this bet. I don't post much in this forum and haven't read the faq lately.. aren't the roi's in there still from party days? edit: I looked they are stars.. but what is attainable 4-6 tabling.. and 20 tabling are 2 different things |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
How many 16s regs have 13% ROI or higher? [/ QUOTE ] The ones that move up soon? |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How many 16s regs have 13% ROI or higher? [/ QUOTE ] The ones that move up soon? [/ QUOTE ] Still never seems to have been too many. I could be sharkscoping too little, though. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] these are the people who have locked up action: meleader2 darnold305 SkinnyLittleTwig popeye18 Gildwulf punter33-3 prodonkey btoowhai i dont think i'm taking much more. maybe one or two people who have already pmed me. [/ QUOTE ] These people might play with you so that kind of sucks for you. Good luck. [/ QUOTE ] I would never do that on principle, first off. Plus $300 isn't worth my time to sit in a bunch of $27 sit and goes. |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] these are the people who have locked up action: meleader2 darnold305 SkinnyLittleTwig popeye18 Gildwulf punter33-3 prodonkey btoowhai i dont think i'm taking much more. maybe one or two people who have already pmed me. [/ QUOTE ] These people might play with you so that kind of sucks for you. Good luck. [/ QUOTE ] I would never do that on principle, first off. Plus $300 isn't worth my time to sit in a bunch of $27 sit and goes. [/ QUOTE ] Ditto, and im bad at sngs. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] this is one sick project. gl. [/ QUOTE ] yea, if you win this, i think we all have to agree its the greatest sng accomplishment ever [/ QUOTE ] I'm gonna assume you're joking, and with absolutely no disrespect to runhot, I figure that 16 tabling... Spacegravy - 25k at 60s - needs almost 80hrs/wk with 7% roi. Runhot- 10k at 27s - needs almost 50hrs/week with 10% roi, or maybe about 43 hours at 9% roi and 20 tabling. Runhot's feat will be awfully impressive if he pulls it out. Spacegravy's feat was completely retarded. Space wins and I don't think it is close. FWIW, I'm pretty sure I could do 10k at the 16s in a month with the right $$$ incentive if I didn't work full time. Sure would love to try it, but I'm sure it would be hell by day 5. GL runhot, this will still be a sick, sick feat. I'm sure you'll pull it off. [/ QUOTE ] your gonna assume im joking, then proceed to answer my joke seriously? i might have been trying to be sarcastic |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW, I'm pretty sure I could do 10k at the 16s in a month with the right $$$ incentive if I didn't work full time. Sure would love to try it, but I'm sure it would be hell by day 5. [/ QUOTE ] It would be nice if we could get one of these a month to follow / take action |
|
|