The Official 2007 Chicago Cubs Thread

[battschr]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Seems we're standing pat, eh? Kind of disappointing.

[/ QUOTE ]

Better then get fleeced I guess.

[/ QUOTE ]
Good point. We already got [censored] fleeced once in the Kendall deal.

[IlliniLou]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Seems we're standing pat, eh? Kind of disappointing.

[/ QUOTE ]

Better then get fleeced I guess.

[/ QUOTE ]
Good point. We already got [censored] fleeced once in the Kendall deal.

[/ QUOTE ]
im so angry .... go get Cordero or Dye, or Gomez, or Greinke, or Conine - this is our frickin chance and we have only 1 true everyday outfielder and the only person you can trust in our bullpen is Marmol

[battschr]

Conine?

[IlliniLou]

[ QUOTE ]
Conine?

[/ QUOTE ]
with Ward out for awhile, would be nice to see him cuz he'd be a great pinch hitter and could backup at first, 3rd and outfield

[dontmesswithme]

LOLOL Conine, you were probably pretty pleased too with the Kendalol acquisition I'm assuming?

[IlliniLou]

[ QUOTE ]
LOLOL Conine, you were probably pretty pleased too with the Kendalol acquisition I'm assuming?

[/ QUOTE ]
actually no i wasnt, Conine is a better option off the bench than anyone the Cubs have right now, is he not? he'd be a bench player, not an everyday player

[Russ M.]

Conine is still in the majors?

[Senor Choppy]

no deal is infinitely better than what would've happened for us. this is a win, be happy.

unless we were going to trade for a good center fielder, a starter to replace marquis, or yet another catcher, we were going to [censored] ourselves.

[Your Mom]

as long as our SP keeps performing, we are fine.

[battschr]

Please don't [censored] us tonight, Marquis.