SSNL POKER [cheese] thread July - Part 1

[tozzy]

[ QUOTE ]

woot? time to move back to party?

Edit: how fast can u get 20k PP for dueces level?

[/ QUOTE ]
rough calcs say about 100k total hands.

[cassette]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


But i would be happy to see a 200k hands graph from multiple levels, let's say from 50NL to 400NL with a winrate of 10ptbb+.

[/ QUOTE ]

No one has one to show. You would be pressed just to get one over 5pt.

[/ QUOTE ]

See Seabeast's 150k hands at 7ptbb/100 at 400NL graph.

[/ QUOTE ]

We agree then. no one has a 200k hands graph at 10ptbb+ at any levels.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is only because you would have to be retarded to not move up. Retards don't play at 10ptbb/100. I agree that 15ptbb/100 is definitely possible 3-4 tabling. Even higher if you were some zen god of concentration and could 1 table.

Lay me 5:1 on 20K and I'll show you 10ptbb/100 over 200K hands one year from today. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[Zaghomat]

[ QUOTE ]

This is only because you would have to be retarded to not move up. Retards don't play at 10ptbb/100. I agree that 15ptbb/100 is definitely possible 3-4 tabling. Even higher if you were some zen god of concentration and could 1 table.

Lay me 5:1 on 20K and I'll show you 10ptbb/100 over 200K hands one year from today. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah my point is that some people act like 10ptbb is "easily" achievable long term, yet nobody can show a graph with that winrate and all the datamining we've seen, nobody is at 10 ptbb over a large sample.

I think some people play 20k hands of 100NL with great winrate, move up and think that the 10-12 ptbb they got in that 20k hands is easily sustainable.

I'm still waiting for someone to show me a 200k hands graphs AT ANY LEVELS with 10ptbb+.

[cassette]

And you never will see that graph because it makes no sense for it to exist. Very different than saying it isn't possible.

[Zaghomat]

So you say that you could do 15ptbb/100 at 100NL ? so you should be capable of almost the same winrate at 200NL no big difference there. and maybe sustain 10 ptbb at 400NL..

Party datamining from last year showed the biggest 5/10 winners at 5-6 ptbb/100 and I'm sure that a lot of people agree that the old party 5/10 is like 1/2 on full tilt now.

[Nielsio]

People,

Your longterm winrate at one level doesn't matter. What matters is that you keep working on your game so that you can move up and beat those guys. If at any time you have a longterm winrate of 5+ptbb/100 then you're doing something wrong because you should move up where there is much more money to win.

SSNL is really baby stakes compared to what's possible.

[pdoran10]

Downswing over, ego sufficiently soothed.

[RiverFenix]

Has anyone preordered PNL off the main page yet?

[goofyballer]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

We agree then. no one has a 200k hands graph at 10ptbb+ at any levels.

[/ QUOTE ]

Bld might at old party 10/20. Thats how sick he is.

[/ QUOTE ]

I remember reading that thread and I think he was at 6.5 ptbb/100 over 300k hands. It just shows that no one beat the game for more than 10ptbb/100 long term, even the best players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Stop being a moron. Yeah, one of the best players in the game couldn't beat 10/20 for 10ptbb; therefore, obviously nobody can beat 1/2 for 10ptbb!

The idiocy you're spewing in this thread is putting me on serious lifetilt. Just stop.

[pdoran10]

agree with goofy. can the idiotic comments about crazy winrates stop plz? thx.