Election! - The Game Thread

[chim17]

Shorty, wth.

You can help us without being voted on.

Why don't you try to point out some wolves so the confirmed villagers can try to vote them out? There's no question you are a good player, you are just playing this game poorly if you are on our team.

[dmk]

touche clown [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[econophile]

cast ballot for Voj

[metsandfinsfan]

[ QUOTE ]
Shorty, wth.

You can help us without being voted on.

Why don't you try to point out some wolves so the confirmed villagers can try to vote them out? There's no question you are a good player, you are just playing this game poorly if you are on our team.

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed. There is no way i am voting for shorty or traz for electorate today.

[ScottHoward]

[ QUOTE ]
cast ballot for traz

he's the centrist around here, has best track record, and I really don't want to see him cry.

[/ QUOTE ]

wow
the bloc comes out, and before anything is decided amp throws his vote on traz?
I would have thought we would discuss this a bit
I think we might as well put at least 2 bloc members in the electorate btw

trazs hatred for my plan makes no sense. im not restricting his voting range, just asking him to tell us who he will lynch before we vote for him. why would I vote for traz if hes going to vote for somebody I think is a villager?

on that note, due to amps total utr antics thus far, and his vote for traz not knowing who traz would lynch:

if voted to the electorate, I will lynch amp (this probably wont happen today though as the bloc members should be enshrined, but, whatever)

[shortline99]

[ QUOTE ]
Shorty, wth.

You can help us without being voted on.

Why don't you try to point out some wolves so the confirmed villagers can try to vote them out? There's no question you are a good player, you are just playing this game poorly if you are on our team.

[/ QUOTE ]
i'm not pointing them out at 5:00 in the afternoon. how many times do i have to explain? i'm just going to get reactions for a few hours, screw with everyone, then post all the wolves just before 10 if i don't make it onto the electorate. if i do make it on, i'll post the wolves at 10:05. no difference, except on the electorate, the assassin can kill me, and you don't have to wait for a lynch squad that wants to.

[shortline99]

[ QUOTE ]

if voted to the electorate, I will lynch amp (this probably wont happen today though as the bloc members should be enshrined, but, whatever)

[/ QUOTE ]
if i am voted to the electorate, amp is at the very top of my list of people to kill. i can say this now with confidence because he never reacts to anything i say, ever, so i might as well get it off my chest while i piss everyone else off.

[clowntable]

I think the post that SH quoted from traz is pretty interesting btw.

[chim17]

I will reserve my judgement until tonight, then.

I just think its entirely inappropriate to not help your team because we don't vote you on. I will hope your ego and feelings will leave room for victory later tonight.

[Iron_Yuppie]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Problems with that plan dmk:
2. If we pick a seer we are really hurting ourselves.


[/ QUOTE ]

The good part about this plan is that the seer can role-claim if he will be the 3rd person voted; this is something the seer can NOT do during a normal assassin kill.

[/ QUOTE ]

basically that person will always roleclaim seer whether they are seer or wolf ... so the roleclaim is useless

[/ QUOTE ]

That is a perfectly fine outcome; once the real seers die, we will know whether to lynch this person or not.

I can understand if people don't want to do this because it is not in the spirit of the game; I kind of feel that way myself.

But strategically, this plan is definitely superior to voting 2 confirmed villagers and one likely villager are elected, and the assassin may or may not take a shot at the one likely villager, without giving him a chance to role-claim.