![]() |
#1091
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Party doesn't count!
and I have 5 at ftp 2/4 over 200k. I was over 5 at 2/4 when I could play party. Forget how many hands but not trivial. |
#1092
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
youre afraid of moving up or experienced downswings lately? anyways, im def. running hot and have a lot (too much) confidence, but atm theres not a single NL200 player i fear. edit: opinion on kodi66? [/ QUOTE ] Playing a mix of 200NL and 400NL atm. Would be playing solely 400NL, but I haven't played much recently and had to cash out a bunch for living expenses etc. What is your sn? Kodi66 doesn't seem too good, just your average aggro TAGgish player. Haven't played him much, but saw him call a nits squeeze with KQo. |
#1093
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] But i would be happy to see a 200k hands graph from multiple levels, let's say from 50NL to 400NL with a winrate of 10ptbb+. [/ QUOTE ] No one has one to show. You would be pressed just to get one over 5pt. [/ QUOTE ] See Seabeast's 150k hands at 7ptbb/100 at 400NL graph. [/ QUOTE ] We agree then. no one has a 200k hands graph at 10ptbb+ at any levels. |
#1094
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] youre afraid of moving up or experienced downswings lately? Kodi66 doesn't seem too good, just your average aggro TAGgish player. Haven't played him much, but saw him call a nits squeeze with KQo. anyways, im def. running hot and have a lot (too much) confidence, but atm theres not a single NL200 player i fear. edit: opinion on kodi66? [/ QUOTE ] Playing a mix of 200NL and 400NL atm. Would be playing solely 400NL, but I haven't played much recently and had to cash out a bunch for living expenses etc. What is your sn? [/ QUOTE ] Kay, i have a similar read. SN via PM, would prefer aim/skype/msn tho [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#1095
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
seabeast...is a beast.
|
#1096
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
We agree then. no one has a 200k hands graph at 10ptbb+ at any levels. [/ QUOTE ] Bld might at old party 10/20. Thats how sick he is. |
#1097
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] We agree then. no one has a 200k hands graph at 10ptbb+ at any levels. [/ QUOTE ] Bld might at old party 10/20. Thats how sick he is. [/ QUOTE ] Hmm. Highly doubt it. |
#1098
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] We agree then. no one has a 200k hands graph at 10ptbb+ at any levels. [/ QUOTE ] Bld might at old party 10/20. Thats how sick he is. [/ QUOTE ] I remember reading that thread and I think he was at 6.5 ptbb/100 over 300k hands. It just shows that no one beat the game for more than 10ptbb/100 long term, even the best players. |
#1099
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Thoughts on these Party 200NL regs? Adamkosh Haribo_Kid UMeHeadsUp4YourRollPlz BaldMancTwat HeavenShallBurn [/ QUOTE ] I ususally play 200NL, just temporarily playing a bit at 100NL at the moment due to a downswing. I've played a quite a few hands with Adamkosh there and he seems to stand out as the of the best regs at 100NL, 3betting a decent amount etc. At 200NL he'll probably be a decent regular but nothing exceptional. As for the others, HeavenShallBurn seems reasonably solid standard TAG. UMeHeadsUp4YourRollPlz and Haribo_Kid I've not played a great deal of hands with (but they seem decent) and I don't recognise BaldMancTwat at all. |
#1100
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
holy party regs thread.
|
![]() |
|
|