|
|
#102
10-31-2007, 12:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] On a sort of unrelated note; I laugh every time people send huge amounts of money to one another. I assume nation and FD have never met, but still they have complete trust for each other. I don't think I'm nessicarily laughing at the naviety, but more at that fact that I'd probably do the same thing. [/ QUOTE ] There are like ~5 2+2'ers who I've never met but would trust my entire roll with.. futuredoc included pretty sick stuff [/ QUOTE ] Semi true. Gotta have honor amongst thieves right. 
|
|
#103
10-31-2007, 01:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] On a serious note, it depends on how you want to define it. If you just have the monkeys going all-in every single hand, eventually one of them will win 7 consecutive all-ins as big underdogs. But if you just have them randomly clicking "bet/fold/call" it's pretty much impossible. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, this question definitely deserves some seriuos discussion. Go! [/ QUOTE ] LOL, I can't help myself it is supposed to be an infinite number of monkeys. this is to demonstrate how vast infinity is. I doubt a million monkeys could pull it off. pretty sure a billion could though prop bet?
|
|
#104
10-31-2007, 01:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] On a serious note, it depends on how you want to define it. If you just have the monkeys going all-in every single hand, eventually one of them will win 7 consecutive all-ins as big underdogs. But if you just have them randomly clicking "bet/fold/call" it's pretty much impossible. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, this question definitely deserves some seriuos discussion. Go! [/ QUOTE ] LOL, I can't help myself it is supposed to be an infinite number of monkeys. this is to demonstrate how vast infinity is. I doubt a million monkeys could pull it off. pretty sure a billion could though prop bet? [/ QUOTE ]  If Blunty comes through with a graph, 1 monkey was all we needed. No hate here, just love and levity
|
|
#105
10-31-2007, 01:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] On a serious note, it depends on how you want to define it. If you just have the monkeys going all-in every single hand, eventually one of them will win 7 consecutive all-ins as big underdogs. But if you just have them randomly clicking "bet/fold/call" it's pretty much impossible. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, this question definitely deserves some seriuos discussion. Go! [/ QUOTE ] LOL, I can't help myself it is supposed to be an infinite number of monkeys. this is to demonstrate how vast infinity is. I doubt a million monkeys could pull it off. pretty sure a billion could though prop bet? [/ QUOTE ] If Blunty comes through with a graph, 1 monkey was all we needed. No hate here, just love and levity [/ QUOTE ] We could solve this problem with a little effort. I wonder if anyone wants to author a computer simulation, lets call it 'bluntytron2000'. It would simulate a poker game in which 8 players were skilled and one player randomly took actions over 100k hands. If we run it 1 million times then we have our answer.
|
|
#106
10-31-2007, 02:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
[ QUOTE ]
future do you want me to hang on to the 2545 or send it back? [/ QUOTE ] if hes not sending anything i guess send it back. Blunty- is there anyone who can vouch for the fact that you are trustworthy to pay me if/when you lose?
|
|
#108
10-31-2007, 02:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
yep
|
|
#110
10-31-2007, 02:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Blunty: 24k at 1/2NL in month.
aint read the thread but i LOL at the thought of blunty making more than 5k let alone 24k in a month at 1/2. from my experience with him he is (or was) one of the badder and spewier regs at those stakes
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
