#101
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
on tribeca I was 5bb/100 over about 40k.
moved to party and I'm breakeven over 41k. i run bad. |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
First 100k hands - 10ptbb/100 at 100NL, second 100k hands 4ptbb/100 at 50/50 200NL and 100NL. I was a much, much better player over the last 100k hands also. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I hate when this happens. I think it mostly because of multitabling and slacking off with game selection when you get better. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
I just don't see why formulating the optimal line should ever have to take more than a few seconds if you're on the ball and concentrating 100%. [/ QUOTE ] Cmon, FE...is this for real? Small sample, but Ill contribute. When I last checked my SSNL stats: FTP 1/2NL: ~7PTBB/100 over ~50K hands. Im sure I ran hot, so I moved up, obv. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
14"
|
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
i'm at 38ptbb/100 at .01/.02 6maxNL
|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
46.62ptbb/100 at 400nl
|
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I just don't see why formulating the optimal line should ever have to take more than a few seconds if you're on the ball and concentrating 100%. [/ QUOTE ] Cmon, FE...is this for real? Small sample, but Ill contribute. When I last checked my SSNL stats: FTP 1/2NL: ~7PTBB/100 over ~50K hands. Im sure I ran hot, so I moved up, obv. [/ QUOTE ] OK this is my last point. Notice that NOBODY has said that the maximal winrate will be attained playing one table only - everybody has suggested at least 2-4 as the number at which your winrate will 100$ of what is possible. This is because for nearly everyone, playing one table is so excruciatingly slow, with so much time between decisions you almost rip their eyes out in boredom. And the difference between playing one table and playing four is very near zero. I'm suggesting that for some people the difference between four and eight tables is the same. |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
14" [/ QUOTE ] LOL that's hilarious. I just noticed that Online win-rates closely correlate with the "penis size" thing. Notice that everybody says that 10PTBB/" is really easy and quite normal and 5-6PTBB/" is horrible. While in actuality 5-6PTBB/" is good, and only the occasional freak attains the coveted 10PTBB/"? lolllllllllll [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 14" [/ QUOTE ] LOL that's hilarious. I just noticed that Online win-rates closely correlate with the "penis size" thing. Notice that everybody says that 10PTBB/" is really easy and quite normal and 5-6PTBB/" is horrible. While in actuality 5-6PTBB/" is good, and only the occasional freak attains the coveted 10PTBB/"? lolllllllllll [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] so rakeback is penis enlargement and losing players have a vagina [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
lmao i guess im just a 12PTBBer then...
|
|
|