Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 05-17-2007, 02:14 PM
swingdoc swingdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 667...Neighbor of the beast
Posts: 804
Default Re: Obesity vs. smoking: What\'s worse?

The obvious answer here is smoking, only because the term "obese" is so terribly defined. Anyone with a BMI of 30 or greater is obese.

Urlacher - 6'4" 258lbs - BMI = 31.4

Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 05-17-2007, 09:34 PM
LondonBroil LondonBroil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: USA #1!
Posts: 2,159
Default Re: Obesity vs. smoking: What\'s worse?

I got halfway through reading this thread and now I'm starving.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 05-18-2007, 02:52 PM
dylan's alias dylan's alias is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 279
Default Re: Obesity vs. smoking: What\'s worse?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Skip -- it's true. People with very low cholesterol (under 150 total) don't get heart attacks. It just doesn't happen.

[/ QUOTE ]

Would you prefer the refutation to this to come in the form of personal anecdotal evidence (I have someone in the intensive care unit right this very second who proves you wrong) or published study evidence?

[/ QUOTE ]

Please refute me with published study evidence.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll help out. Here's the abstract of a study looking at men under 55 and women under 65 who came to the hospital with a heart attack, had their cholesterol checked and were not on a cholesterol lowering medication.

One thing you need to know about cholesterol numbers. LDL (bad cholesterol) is the measurement in this study, as all current guidelines are based on LDL and HDL separately, not as a total. Your benchmark of total cholesterol of 150 would probably best correspond to an LDL of about 110. I made that estimate by using 200 as a total cholesterol that was considered borderline high in a patient without other coronary risk factors. 130 LDL probably is the equivalent number.

Here's the important line from the abstract: [ QUOTE ]
Measurements and results: Of the 183 patients who met the inclusion criteria, as many as 68% (124 patients) had LDL cholesterol levels of <= 130 mg/dL, 29% (53 patients) had LDL cholesterol level of <= 100 mg/dL, and only 14% (26 patients) had LDL cholesterol levels of >= 160 mg/dL.

[/ QUOTE ]

So 29% of their heart attack patients had low cholesterol and only 14 had extremely high cholesterol.

Link to abstract


As for which is worse, smoking or obesity, I say smoking. Here's some data which assesses additional risk of heart attack based on smoking vs non-smoking and obesity vs. non-obesity:

[ QUOTE ]
FINDINGS: Current smoking was associated with a greater risk of non-fatal AMI (odds ratio [OR] 2.95, 95% CI 2.77-3.14, p<0.0001) compared with never smoking; risk increased by 5.6% for every additional cigarette smoked. The OR associated with former smoking fell to 1.87 (95% CI 1.55-2.24) within 3 years of quitting. A residual excess risk remained 20 or more years after quitting (1.22, 1.09-1.37).

[/ QUOTE ]
Link to abstract

For obesity, Body Mass Index was not found to correlate particularly well with heart attack risk, but waist to hip ratio was.

[ QUOTE ]
For waist-to-hip ratio, the odds ratios for every successive quintile were significantly greater than that of the previous one (2nd quintile: 1.15, 1.05-1.26; 3rd quintile: 1.39; 1.28-1.52; 4th quintile: 1.90, 1.74-2.07; and 5th quintiles: 2.52, 2.31-2.74 [adjusted for age, sex, region, and smoking]). Waist (adjusted OR 1.77; 1.59-1.97) and hip (0.73; 0.66-0.80) circumferences were both highly significant after adjustment for BMI (p<0.0001 top vs bottom quintiles). Waist-to-hip ratio and waist and hip circumferences were closely (p<0.0001) associated with risk of myocardial infarction even after adjustment for other risk factors (ORs for top quintile vs lowest quintiles were 1.75, 1.33, and 0.76, respectively).

[/ QUOTE ]

Link to abstract

SHORT SUMMARY:

The odds ratio for smoking was 2.95 (about 3x more likely to have a heart attack of you smoke). The odds ratio for being obese was 2.52 for the heaviest quintile.

So, for heart disease, there is strong evidence that smoking is worse for you than obesity.


Dylan's Alias - Pulmonologist
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 05-18-2007, 05:15 PM
Subfallen Subfallen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Worshipping idols in B&W.
Posts: 3,398
Default Re: Obesity vs. smoking: What\'s worse?

Haha, mjkidd == soooo pwned. Nice post dylan.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 05-18-2007, 05:39 PM
GiantWalleye GiantWalleye is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Up Nort, shooting at ducks
Posts: 884
Default Re: Obesity vs. smoking: What\'s worse?

[ QUOTE ]
The obvious answer here is smoking, only because the term "obese" is so terribly defined. Anyone with a BMI of 30 or greater is obese.

Urlacher - 6'4" 258lbs - BMI = 31.4



[/ QUOTE ]

I am 6'3" 245lbs so I guess I would be technically overweight or obese. (I'm a pretty built/fit 245) I would challenge any heavy smoker to any physical activity just because I feel I am in better health than about 99.9 percent of heavy smokers.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 05-18-2007, 06:18 PM
bwana devil bwana devil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: austin
Posts: 4,617
Default Re: Obesity vs. smoking: What\'s worse?

[ QUOTE ]
The obvious answer here is smoking, only because the term "obese" is so terribly defined. Anyone with a BMI of 30 or greater is obese.

Urlacher - 6'4" 258lbs - BMI = 31.4

[/ QUOTE ]

BMI doesnt apply to people with a lot of muscle mass. why do people pretend to debunk some complex principle when they inevitably state some example like this?
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 05-18-2007, 06:44 PM
siccjay siccjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Aqua Man That Hoe!
Posts: 6,717
Default Re: Obesity vs. smoking: What\'s worse?

Obese is worse. I would rather bang a girl that smokes than an obese woman.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 05-18-2007, 06:48 PM
daryn daryn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 18,335
Default Re: Obesity vs. smoking: What\'s worse?

[ QUOTE ]
Obese is worse. I would rather bang a girl that smokes than an obese woman.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah but you'd rather take food recommendations from an obese woman i bet. in other words, who cares who you would rather bang?
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 05-18-2007, 06:51 PM
siccjay siccjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Aqua Man That Hoe!
Posts: 6,717
Default Re: Obesity vs. smoking: What\'s worse?

Well for one I do. I didn't thin you were obese daryn, please forgive me.
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 05-18-2007, 06:52 PM
daryn daryn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 18,335
Default Re: Obesity vs. smoking: What\'s worse?

[ QUOTE ]
Well for one I do. I didn't thin you were obese daryn, please forgive me.

[/ QUOTE ]

you've misunderstood my point i guess. i'm just saying the thread wasn't about who you'd like to bang.


it's like a thread, what's healthier, a carrot or a cheeseburger. well, i'd rather eat the cheeseburger, so it must be better!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.