Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: ...?
Check 4 5.48%
1/3 6 8.22%
1/2 25 34.25%
Push 38 52.05%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 04-02-2007, 08:14 PM
Eagles Eagles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Saving the season
Posts: 8,324
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

Degenerasian,
John mcdonald and royce clayton are both pretty bad defensively.
Link
Link

Guys like Ted Lilly are not a dime a dozen. Ted Lilly is one of the 50 best starters in the Majors. He is a very good pitcher and far better than chacin, ohka, towers, thomson, and zambrano.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 04-02-2007, 09:06 PM
bigt2k4 bigt2k4 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UWO/ London, ON
Posts: 4,131
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Degenerasian,
John mcdonald and royce clayton are both pretty bad defensively.
Link
Link

Guys like Ted Lilly are not a dime a dozen. Ted Lilly is one of the 50 best starters in the Majors. He is a very good pitcher and far better than chacin, ohka, towers, thomson, and zambrano.

[/ QUOTE ]
uh no, I havent seen Clayton, but I hear he is pretty good defensively, but not the greatest bat. Mcdonald is a top 5 defensive shortstop in the game, but has absolutely no bat.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 04-02-2007, 09:26 PM
TheRover TheRover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,910
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Degenerasian,
John mcdonald and royce clayton are both pretty bad defensively.
Link
Link

Guys like Ted Lilly are not a dime a dozen. Ted Lilly is one of the 50 best starters in the Majors. He is a very good pitcher and far better than chacin, ohka, towers, thomson, and zambrano.

[/ QUOTE ]
uh no, I havent seen Clayton, but I hear he is pretty good defensively, but not the greatest bat. Mcdonald is a top 5 defensive shortstop in the game, but has absolutely no bat.

[/ QUOTE ]

did you not even click on those links or what? p.s. royce clayton is like 45 years old. make a list of SS that were good defensively at 40+. go.

although i don't know why he said mcdonald was bad defensively when nothing in the link said that.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 04-02-2007, 09:32 PM
Degenerasian Degenerasian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Univ. of Toronto
Posts: 627
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Degenerasian,
John mcdonald and royce clayton are both pretty bad defensively.
Link
Link

Guys like Ted Lilly are not a dime a dozen. Ted Lilly is one of the 50 best starters in the Majors. He is a very good pitcher and far better than chacin, ohka, towers, thomson, and zambrano.

[/ QUOTE ]

OK, who is this guy lol? I might have missed it, but he provides no explanation of what RSpt and RS/150 mean. I do not know the legitimacy of these rankings but theres a lot of flaws, like Ichiro not being the best defensive RF in the AL. Also Vernon does not deserve to be named #2 defensive CF in the AL if you ask me.

In regards to Lilly, I can agree with the people you name that he is better than. Mainly because they all suck and are below average pitchers. I am pretty sure I can name you 50 starters better than Lilly. His career ERA is 4.60 and wouldnt have won 15 games last year if he was on a team that couldn't hit. He does not really have a great pitch and last year was his best year.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 04-04-2007, 04:45 PM
vin17 vin17 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 767
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

Did I miss the memo saying head high fastballs were OK to swing at on 0-2 counts?
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 04-04-2007, 04:48 PM
Degenerasian Degenerasian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Univ. of Toronto
Posts: 627
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Did I miss the memo saying head high fastballs were OK to swing at on 0-2 counts?

[/ QUOTE ]

lol
we deserved to lose that game anyway, but yeah it does hurt to see a amazing comeback fall short
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 04-04-2007, 04:59 PM
Eagles Eagles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Saving the season
Posts: 8,324
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Degenerasian,
John mcdonald and royce clayton are both pretty bad defensively.
Link
Link

Guys like Ted Lilly are not a dime a dozen. Ted Lilly is one of the 50 best starters in the Majors. He is a very good pitcher and far better than chacin, ohka, towers, thomson, and zambrano.

[/ QUOTE ]

OK, who is this guy lol? I might have missed it, but he provides no explanation of what RSpt and RS/150 mean. I do not know the legitimacy of these rankings but theres a lot of flaws, like Ichiro not being the best defensive RF in the AL. Also Vernon does not deserve to be named #2 defensive CF in the AL if you ask me.

In regards to Lilly, I can agree with the people you name that he is better than. Mainly because they all suck and are below average pitchers. I am pretty sure I can name you 50 starters better than Lilly. His career ERA is 4.60 and wouldnt have won 15 games last year if he was on a team that couldn't hit. He does not really have a great pitch and last year was his best year.

[/ QUOTE ]
Chris Dial is very well respected in the sabrmetric community for his defensive rankings.
Link
This explains how he makes his rankings rs=run saved.

Please don't quote Lilly's 15 wins because wins is basically a meaningless stat.

Lilly might not be top 50 but he is very close. Where would you rank him?
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 04-04-2007, 05:11 PM
Degenerasian Degenerasian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Univ. of Toronto
Posts: 627
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

I quoted Lilly's wins because it was one of the few good stats he posted last year. That and his K's numbers were good too.

Ted Lilly is just too inconsistent to be named a top 50 pitcher. I'd probably have him in the 65-75 range.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 04-04-2007, 05:13 PM
Eagles Eagles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Saving the season
Posts: 8,324
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

[ QUOTE ]
I quoted Lilly's wins because it was one of the few good stats he posted last year. That and his K's numbers were good too.

Ted Lilly is just too inconsistent to be named a top 50 pitcher. I'd probably have him in the 65-75 range.

[/ QUOTE ]


Okay I disagree but that's fine. Now do you realize how valuable a 65-75 starting pitcher is?
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 04-04-2007, 05:25 PM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: 2007 Toronto Blue Jays Thread

Degenerasian,
Chris Dial's defensive rankings are probably the most accurate defensive rankings. There are certain flaws namely that defense has a lot of variance so in a particular year it's possible one player is getting lucky and his rankings overrate that players skill. It's funny when people say stuff like McDonald or Royce Clayton are such good defensive SS when Aaron Hill is a better SS than both of them.

Reed Johnson had a career year last year while platooning he will regress a lot this year. As for your rankings of leadoff hitters, Jeter (is 2 this year), Sizemore, Crawford and Hanley are all better than Ichiro and Soriano.

Notice how every team in baseball (pretty much, please don't be a nit) always needs starting pitching. Having a mediocre second starter or very good third starter is an incredibly valuable commodity. Lilly has a really good curve ball when it is on, his bigger problem is his really high walk rate and his high home run rate.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.