#101
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker: Cheque-raiser (return of the tickets-promotions?)
I realized that 50NL was the optimal game to play. Each time a flop is seen, rake is taken, and since it is the lowest game, where this happens, it must have the most loose (read: bad) players, and therfore the most flops.
For some reason I can easily beat the 25NL, but each time I even think about playing 50NL I just loose, loose, loose. |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker: Cheque-raiser (return of the tickets-promotions?)
Sig, will you PM your screen name. Did you play today? If so, can you let me know who you are?
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker: Cheque-raiser (return of the tickets-promotions?)
[ QUOTE ]
I realized that 50NL was the optimal game to play. Each time a flop is seen, rake is taken, and since it is the lowest game, where this happens, it must have the most loose (read: bad) players, and therfore the most flops. For some reason I can easily beat the 25NL, but each time I even think about playing 50NL I just loose, loose, loose. [/ QUOTE ] Pretty strange that you think NL50 is ideal since thats what I played nonstop on day 2 without 1 single paus and I finished 11.... |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker: Cheque-raiser (return of the tickets-promotions?)
I played for two days at $50NL and came 3rd and 6th. I think a really important factor in finishing top 10 is using partybetpot or a similar program to make betting quicker and hence playing more hands.
I played it with a fellow 2+2er on Sunday and that was our only difference. I came 3rd, him ~16th. |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker: Cheque-raiser (return of the tickets-promotions?)
To be fair, I don't use any of that and I managed Top 10 twice. I should get that addon though.
|
|
|