#101
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Team USA really sucked it hard [/ QUOTE ] While true the WBC does tend to show my point. Collections of superstars (USA, Dominican) were inferior to teams (Japan, Cuba). Granted if those superstar collections had a proper spring training and a full season together things may have turned out differently. Better talent is a good thing in baseball. I just think that statistically oriented baseball fans miss a lot of the big picture that is emphasised by proper team and situational play. [/ QUOTE ] It sounds like you might be completely overlooking the effects of variance in a short series or a small number of games. |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Team USA really sucked it hard [/ QUOTE ] While true the WBC does tend to show my point. Collections of superstars (USA, Dominican) were inferior to teams (Japan, Cuba). [/ QUOTE ] If the Yankees got sweeped by the Royals, would that make KC the superior team? |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Team USA really sucked it hard [/ QUOTE ] While true the WBC does tend to show my point. Collections of superstars (USA, Dominican) were inferior to teams (Japan, Cuba). Granted if those superstar collections had a proper spring training and a full season together things may have turned out differently. Better talent is a good thing in baseball. I just think that statistically oriented baseball fans miss a lot of the big picture that is emphasised by proper team and situational play. [/ QUOTE ] No, it doesn't. This is what is commonly known in the poker world as "small sample size" problems. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
[ QUOTE ]
This is what is commonly known in the poker world as "small sample size" problems. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah I covered that. Please learn to read. [ QUOTE ] if those superstar collections had a proper spring training and a full season together things may have turned out differently [/ QUOTE ] |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This is what is commonly known in the poker world as "small sample size" problems. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah I covered that. Please learn to read. [ QUOTE ] if those superstar collections had a proper spring training and a full season together things may have turned out differently [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] That doesn't cover it at all. |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
This was an awesome thread, and as the playoffs approach, I'd really like to give this a bump to see how things have changed.
Catcher: Victor Martinez is good, but Joe Mauer is probably better. 1B: Do you move Pujols to LF/RF to make room for Berkman or keep him here? 2B: Chase Utley, not close. SS: Jeter's had an awesome season or is it still Tejada? 3B: A-Rod or Cabrera? LF: Is there a better argument for Manny now than there was? CF: I don't think anyone's still picking Jones now. Beltran? Sizemore? RF: It's still gotta be Vlad, right? DH: Ortiz, considering Hafner's hurt. SP: Santana, not close. Webb, Carpenter, Rivera are all in the BP. Oh, and the tigers are obviously for real. |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
I'm going to put in a (homer) vote for Wells in center. Also, is Ichiro in RF an option? There was an SI players pole where he was voted best OF arm in the majors.
|
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
Catcher Mauer
1b Pujols 2B Utley SS Tejada 3b Miggy or Arod LF Manny CF Sizemore or Beltran RF Vlad DH Hafner. SP Santana |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLB theoretical All-Star team
[ QUOTE ]
I'm going to put in a (homer) vote for Wells in center. Also, is Ichiro in RF an option? There was an SI players pole where he was voted best OF arm in the majors. [/ QUOTE ] Ichiro is much closer to being amongst the worst RF in the majors than the best.(Overall - not arm.) |
|
|