Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 04-03-2005, 08:22 PM
tbach24 tbach24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Knocking down 3\'s for the C\'s
Posts: 6,563
Default Re: Ok Mebenhoe

[ QUOTE ]
No, K/9 is more important. WHIP is still heavily influenced by defense.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm working on a calculation to prove/disprove this, what's an appropriate fielding percentage?
  #102  
Old 04-03-2005, 08:27 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Ok Mebenhoe

Fielding percentage is flawed and would not work for your analysis.

Look into DIPS research done by Voros McCracken mostly. Most of the difference on batting average on ball in played allowed by pitchers is due to defense, randomness.

It's been proven that the DIPS ERA, which is comprised mostly of K, BB, and HR rates, is a better predictor of next year's ERA than ERA is. If you can follow what I'm saying.
  #103  
Old 04-03-2005, 08:29 PM
tbach24 tbach24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Knocking down 3\'s for the C\'s
Posts: 6,563
Default Re: Ok Mebenhoe

[ QUOTE ]
Fielding percentage is flawed and would not work for your analysis.

Look into DIPS research done by Voros McCracken mostly. Most of the difference on batting average on ball in played allowed by pitchers is due to defense, randomness.

It's been proven that the DIPS ERA, which is comprised mostly of K, BB, and HR rates, is a better predictor of next year's ERA than ERA is. If you can follow what I'm saying.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I got it. TY for the info, looking it up as we speak.
  #104  
Old 04-03-2005, 08:35 PM
Hoya Hoya is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: See God Cole
Posts: 1,610
Default Re: Ok Mebenhoe

A follow-up study showed that pitchers have a lot more control over balls in play than Voros originally thought. I forget who did it, however.
  #105  
Old 04-03-2005, 08:47 PM
DangerGoodson DangerGoodson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: On Life Tilt
Posts: 602
Default Re: Ok Mebenhoe

Only yankee fans would give a cheater a standing ovation.
  #106  
Old 04-03-2005, 08:52 PM
istewart istewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,990
Default Re: Ok Mebenhoe

Yes, because Bonds, Sosa and Palmeiro will all be booed mercilessly.
  #107  
Old 04-03-2005, 09:07 PM
DangerGoodson DangerGoodson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: On Life Tilt
Posts: 602
Default Re: Ok Mebenhoe

[ QUOTE ]
Yes, because Bonds, Sosa and Palmeiro will all be booed mercilessly.

[/ QUOTE ]

but standing O?, the guy hit like .200 last year.
  #108  
Old 04-03-2005, 09:10 PM
istewart istewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,990
Default Re: Ok Mebenhoe

Well, that's Yankees fans [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
  #109  
Old 04-03-2005, 09:21 PM
Dead Dead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dreaming of Fenway
Posts: 6,748
Default Re: OFFICIAL YANKEES 2005 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS OR BUST THREAD

Suck it Red Sox.

4-1 Yanks.

The Yankees pwn. The Yankeeeeeessss pwn.
  #110  
Old 04-03-2005, 09:22 PM
Dead Dead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dreaming of Fenway
Posts: 6,748
Default Re: Ok Mebenhoe

Nice avatar homie.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.