Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 11-26-2006, 04:27 AM
David Sklansky David Sklansky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,092
Default Re: A Free-for-All on Science and Religion

"Einstein's theory of relativity was CERTAINLY seen as "magical thinking" at one point... virtually no one accepted his theory initially."

What nonsense. No one thought his theory was magical thinking. Many thought it might be incorrect. But all knew it came from meticulous deduction, a knowledge of advanced physics, tensor analysis, Riemann geometry, and from the mind of someone who can think a hundred times better than the morons who throw out ridiculous religious theories with no deep thought behind them.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 11-26-2006, 04:42 AM
smurfitup smurfitup is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: insomnia
Posts: 607
Default Re: A Free-for-All on Science and Religion

I love Richard Dawkins' ideas, but he is incredibly arrogant.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 11-26-2006, 05:09 AM
MidGe MidGe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Shame on you, Blackwater!
Posts: 3,908
Default Re: A Free-for-All on Science and Religion

[ QUOTE ]
I love Richard Dawkins' ideas, but he is incredibly arrogant.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not quite as arrogant as most theists. At least he doesn't claim divinity on his side! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 11-26-2006, 11:55 AM
Matt R. Matt R. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,298
Default Re: A Free-for-All on Science and Religion

David,
If someone throws a ridiculous physical theory out there with some mathematics and reasoning to back it up, but it is still based on ridiculous assumptions most scientists would not be too far off in calling it "magical thinking".

It took a LONG time for the community to accept relativity because it was so vastly different than what they were used to. The fact that it was right and later accepted is not my point. It had to start somewhere, and in the beginning most scientists thought it was ridiculous... i.e. it was "magical thinking" that it could possibly be true that this was how the universe works.

There have been mathematicians in the past who believed in God, and who tried to use mathematics to prove it. Their analysis is certainly a lot more rigorous than your typical religious person. For them, is belief in God no longer "magical thinking", even though it may be wrong?

I am simply trying to show that "magical thinking" is essentially the creativity and imagination of the human mind. It is used in every aspect of life. Science and religion. Science can be wrong sometimes too, yet we aren't arguing to throw out all science. Religion can be wrong sometimes, yet we are arguing all religion is irrational and dangerous.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 11-26-2006, 11:57 AM
Matt R. Matt R. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,298
Default Re: A Free-for-All on Science and Religion

Lestat,
Definitely. I have a big problem with those aspects of religion as well.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 11-26-2006, 02:33 PM
MaxWeiss MaxWeiss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 1,087
Default Re: A Free-for-All on Science and Religion

I'm on Sam Harris's website's mailing list. He sent out video links to a lot of these talks. Good stuff.

http://beyondbelief2006.org/Watch/
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.