#101
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Poker Rakeback?
PM me please!
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Poker Rakeback?
pm me too please
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Poker Rakeback?
[ QUOTE ]
pm me too please [/ QUOTE ] |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Poker Rakeback? *DELETED*
Post deleted by Pokeraddict
|
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Poker Rakeback? *DELETED*
Post deleted by Pokeraddict
|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Poker Rakeback?
OK, these shill posts and the PMs you're sending are getting to be a bit much...
|
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Poker Rakeback? *DELETED*
Post deleted by Pokeraddict
|
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Poker Rakeback? *DELETED*
Post deleted by Pokeraddict
|
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Poker Rakeback?
anyone tried pokerisivut?
|
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Poker Rakeback?
OK, first of all I need to apologize to DeeezNuts. I forgot this was the thread where, months ago, I did ask for PMs. It's been a while, but still, my request is in this thread, so the PM was a legitimate response. Sorry, DeeezNuts.
Now, the reason why your and Joonas81's posts are being viewed with some skepticism (not just by me...see the other thread) is the fact that you are both fairly new to the forums, and your first and only posts are in these threads endorsing a site. Fair or not, those with a little more experience/cynicism recognize these as the hallmarks of a spammer. The fact that you PM'd me seems to indicate that you are in some way affiliated with the site...if so, you really need to identify yourself as such. |
|
|