![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Which would win? | |||
A duck the size of a horse |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
36 | 56.25% |
100 duck sized horses |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
28 | 43.75% |
Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1071
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
what are you thinking herbie if its 4 .. who goes first? This is what i think you are thinking: the 3 of us eliminate roundtower. [/ QUOTE ] I think it's very likely that you/zurv team up and dmk/rt team up and then the tiebreaker comes into play with you guys hoping that whoever goes 5th will reward you for your previous play (which I know I would). Yes DMK's best play is to get rid of you and Zurv which is why he wanted 5 ldo |
#1072
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
my best chance of winning heads up would be against eskimo right? So shouldnt i want to bring him along?
thing is, i do not want to reward him for his indifference. This has been consistent with my attitude the whole game. This is why i killed spook, my mason in +/-. This is how i play the game |
#1073
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
zurv i implore that you kill monk tonight
|
#1074
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
my best chance of winning heads up would be against eskimo right? So shouldnt i want to bring him along? [/ QUOTE ] Mets, I know you are a smart guy so I'm not even going to justify this level one ridiculousness with a response. |
#1075
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Also - if you guys succeed in limiting the alliance to four you should definitely eliminate me in 5th place because you know I will reward you for hoodwinking two people into allowing you to pull off such an awesomely self-serving move that completely torpedoes everyone elses chances of winning. [/ QUOTE ] A 4 person alliance makes more sense than a 5 person alliance here, for the same reason a 7 person alliance made more sense than an 8 person alliance a week ago - everybody in the alliance benefits. I was willing to accept 8 last week, because I was unsure about 1 or 2 of the members, and wanted backup. I don't have those same worries this time. BTW, if I knew how things would work out at final 4, I'd be a happy man. I don't think the final 4 is going to go well for me, but we'll see in a couple days. |
#1076
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if you are limiting to 4 instead of 5, i may be tempted to switch to whoever the minority leader is
|
#1077
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Mets, I know you are a smart guy so I'm not even going to justify this level one ridiculousness with a response. [/ QUOTE ] i have been trying to bring monk along for the ride the whole time. Read the thread. Even today zurvan suggested roundtower i suggested monk. and it's cool. No response is probably best for me anyway so thx |
#1078
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
if you are limiting to 4 instead of 5, i may be tempted to switch to whoever the minority leader is [/ QUOTE ] so then you would be taking your chances that bravos shows up and votes ... otherwise at best it would be a tie ... and then val probably kills eskimo and you're in bad shape do what you gotta do ... but eskimo hasnt even said he wanted to join yet |
#1079
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
if you are limiting to 4 instead of 5, i may be tempted to switch to whoever the minority leader is [/ QUOTE ] 1. Why? 2. Who would you like to be fifth? Does it matter to you? |
#1080
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and also bravos would be in a spot to choose sides and you dont know which side he would choose at that point
i dont understand why you are making this so difficult dmk |
![]() |
|
|