Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: If Santana Moss doesn't play this week, who plays?
G. Jennings @ MIN 2 22.22%
Re. Williams vs HOU 7 77.78%
Ma. Clayton @ TEN 0 0%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1051  
Old 11-04-2007, 08:00 PM
Jurollo Jurollo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,764
Default Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****

There is 1. 2 more Pats.
Reply With Quote
  #1052  
Old 11-04-2007, 08:00 PM
sublime sublime is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: our only chance!
Posts: 15,586
Default Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****

colts have played a great defensive game today btw. just sick good.
Reply With Quote
  #1053  
Old 11-04-2007, 08:00 PM
NT! NT! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 17,165
Default Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
shipitt

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL like their D can stop Indy..

[/ QUOTE ]

their d has actually done a pretty good job of stopping indy when they aren't given a short field or a bunch of cheap PI's.
Reply With Quote
  #1054  
Old 11-04-2007, 08:00 PM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
8/131 vs. 2/10


[/ QUOTE ]

1. neutral zone infraction - obvious call
2. PI - consensus call
3. illegal contact - obvious call
4. PI - debatable call
5. Illegal formation - obvious (declined)
6. personal foul (leg whip) - obvious call
7. ineligible downfield - obvious call
8. unsportsnmanlike (block OOB) - obvious call
9. personal foul (on int return) - not replayed
10. off interference - debatable

6 obvious flags, 1 likely, 2 debatable, and 1 not replayed.

Basically, 1 debatable PI flag early that had an effect, and NE has definately committed far more penalties than IND otherwise, and have deserved the majority of calls that have been made.

[/ QUOTE ]
[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Redbean
Reply With Quote
  #1055  
Old 11-04-2007, 08:00 PM
FlyWf FlyWf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brian Coming imo
Posts: 3,237
Default Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****

What is it about people from Boston that they can't win or lose with class? At least meet the rest of us halfway.
Reply With Quote
  #1056  
Old 11-04-2007, 08:00 PM
Edge34 Edge34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Flame Magnet
Posts: 4,830
Default Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm hoping neither Edge nor Sublime posts in this thread again.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

I am just fine with whatever people say until guys like sublime come in here and tell me to die. That doesn't fly in pretty much any forum except for BBV and he does it to me for absolutely no reason.

I have been more than fair and I don't want to distract from this thread any more.
Reply With Quote
  #1057  
Old 11-04-2007, 08:00 PM
Jurollo Jurollo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,764
Default Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****

[ QUOTE ]
There is 0. 3 more Pats.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #1058  
Old 11-04-2007, 08:00 PM
bravos1 bravos1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: looking for the bigger nits
Posts: 7,905
Default Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****

This drive will prolly be 12 plays.. 8 of which are runs to Addai for 55 yards...lol
Reply With Quote
  #1059  
Old 11-04-2007, 08:01 PM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****

[ QUOTE ]
I thought the Randy Moss PI call was a pretty clear no call.

[/ QUOTE ]

he got away with one the TD catch
Reply With Quote
  #1060  
Old 11-04-2007, 08:01 PM
damaniac damaniac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Looking for law jobs
Posts: 2,917
Default Re: ***** Clash of the Titans, Week 9: NE @ Ind*****

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
8/131 vs. 2/10


[/ QUOTE ]

1. neutral zone infraction - obvious call
2. PI - consensus call
3. illegal contact - obvious call
4. PI - debatable call
5. Illegal formation - obvious (declined)
6. personal foul (leg whip) - obvious call
7. ineligible downfield - obvious call
8. unsportsnmanlike (block OOB) - obvious call
9. personal foul (on int return) - not replayed
10. off interference - debatable

6 obvious flags, 1 likely, 2 debatable, and 1 not replayed.

Basically, 1 debatable PI flag early that had an effect, and NE has definately committed far more penalties than IND otherwise, and have deserved the majority of calls that have been made.

[/ QUOTE ]\

Fine, except calling the two PI's "debatable" is just idiotic. They're not. They were awful.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.