![]() |
#1001
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1k
|
#1002
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Is he still playing them? [/ QUOTE ] No i think he was lost he only played me. |
#1003
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Lol just played Chris Moneymaker on a 110 HU. I lost with some bad luck but was funny to play him. [/ QUOTE ] When I used to play 6-max he was the biggest loser in my PT database. ...followed by me. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#1004
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to sharkscope he is a loser. But who cares, he doesnt need to win since he can afort to loose and just plays occasionly on ps for promotion.
|
#1005
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm just jealous.
|
#1006
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hrmmm... moneymaker a losing player in real life... I never would have thought. No no... I dont believe it, he is just TOO good to not be owning every time he plays
|
#1007
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He did make the bluff of the century.
|
#1008
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
He did make the dumb call of the century. [/ QUOTE ] The guy won because he was a suck-out master. One of my friends believes it is a conspiracy. He makes a good point. Some dude, who was broke, had 40 dollars and won the biggest, hardest tourney in the world. He had absolutely no poker experience, and his name just so happened to be Moneymaker. To good to be true? He thinks so. |
#1009
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
won the biggest, juciest tourney in the world. [/ QUOTE ] Try again. |
#1010
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't care how juicy it is, you have to be a massive luckbox to win.
Also, worst losing session of my life yesterday. Two tables of HU vs. a hyper-aggro maniac who HITS EVERY SINGLE BOARD. -$750 in like 20 minutes at 1/2. I hate poker. |
![]() |
|
|