Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:15 AM
Low Key Low Key is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 548
Default Re: Yes, finally another Ron Paul-thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
In the fact that you didn't move. You don't really think America is the most free country there is, do you?

[/ QUOTE ]

You're completely ignoring that countries make it extremely difficult to come live there and become citizens. If I could just say pick up and move to Australia, I might well do so, but they're not too excited about people coming and living there if they don't like own a business or have some job skill they're getting employment with. There's also the fact that if people come onto your land and use force to make you do what they want, the proper response is to fight back, not run away.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh, so you don't want to take action and move because it'd be hard. Suddenly I don't feel so bad for not wanting to deal with all the BS that would come from sudden deregulation of all markets.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:15 AM
Low Key Low Key is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 548
Default Re: Yes, finally another Ron Paul-thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
On that topic, living in America means you're okay with certain things, like following our laws.

[/ QUOTE ]

No it doesn't. I was never given a contract to sign.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you're not okay with our rules, then you really should leave.

[/ QUOTE ]

So if your neighbors come into your home and start breaking your stuff, since you don't like their rules, you really should leave.

[/ QUOTE ]

Swing and a miss. You live in America, America didn't invade you.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:19 AM
AlexM AlexM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Imaginationland
Posts: 5,200
Default Re: Yes, finally another Ron Paul-thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Threat of violence is violence.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, here's how it works:

Violence = Violence
Threat of violence = Threat of violence

Do you see the difference there?

[/ QUOTE ]

Semantically, yes. Morally and ethically, no.

[ QUOTE ]
Also, I can't wait til all these posts are deleted since we completely highjacked this thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

You cannot have a decent political discussions without going off on tangents (or any discussion IMO, but it's worse with politics). Any board that is as iron-handed as you describe is a crappy, crappy board. This one isn't. If people are deliberately hijacking threads, they might get temp banned, but when it's the natural flow of conversation, it is what it is.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:21 AM
Ron Burgundy Ron Burgundy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ronpaul2008.com
Posts: 5,208
Default Re: Yes, finally another Ron Paul-thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
On that topic, living in America means you're okay with certain things, like following our laws.

[/ QUOTE ]

No it doesn't. I was never given a contract to sign.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you're not okay with our rules, then you really should leave. That's part of the social contract of choosing to live in a civilized society. If you don't like our rules, you're very free to leave. If you think rule of law is BS, by all means, that actually IS one of the things I think a person should exit stage left for. (As opposed to the phony patriotic "if you don't like bush, get out!" rhetoric you'll hear on ultra-conservative radioshows and such)

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah, the old "you chose to live here" argument.

1. I didn't choose to live here. I live here because my parents had sex here.

2. People can't just pick up and move to another country whenever they feel like it. Other countries have laws restricting your ability to do that. Your argument is entirely dependent on the laws of other countries. And some people simply don't have the money to move. So what you're saying is that only people with the means to relocate to another country should have all the rights they believe they deserve.

3. Why should I just run away every time my rights are violated? I would rather stand up for myself and the rights of others who may not have the option of moving to another country.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:21 AM
AlexM AlexM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Imaginationland
Posts: 5,200
Default Re: Yes, finally another Ron Paul-thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
In the fact that you didn't move. You don't really think America is the most free country there is, do you?

[/ QUOTE ]

You're completely ignoring that countries make it extremely difficult to come live there and become citizens. If I could just say pick up and move to Australia, I might well do so, but they're not too excited about people coming and living there if they don't like own a business or have some job skill they're getting employment with. There's also the fact that if people come onto your land and use force to make you do what they want, the proper response is to fight back, not run away.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh, so you don't want to take action and move because it'd be hard.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nice cherry picking. The primary reason I don't want to move is because running away from people who are violating you and have no right just encourages them to follow.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:22 AM
AlexM AlexM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Imaginationland
Posts: 5,200
Default Re: Yes, finally another Ron Paul-thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
On that topic, living in America means you're okay with certain things, like following our laws.

[/ QUOTE ]

No it doesn't. I was never given a contract to sign.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you're not okay with our rules, then you really should leave.

[/ QUOTE ]

So if your neighbors come into your home and start breaking your stuff, since you don't like their rules, you really should leave.

[/ QUOTE ]

Swing and a miss. You live in America, America didn't invade you.

[/ QUOTE ]

So? The government doesn't own the land, private individuals do. Unless you're saying there's no private property in America?
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:25 AM
AlexM AlexM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Imaginationland
Posts: 5,200
Default Re: Yes, finally another Ron Paul-thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
On that topic, living in America means you're okay with certain things, like following our laws.

[/ QUOTE ]

No it doesn't. I was never given a contract to sign.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you're not okay with our rules, then you really should leave. That's part of the social contract of choosing to live in a civilized society. If you don't like our rules, you're very free to leave. If you think rule of law is BS, by all means, that actually IS one of the things I think a person should exit stage left for. (As opposed to the phony patriotic "if you don't like bush, get out!" rhetoric you'll hear on ultra-conservative radioshows and such)

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah, the old "you chose to live here" argument.

1. I didn't choose to live here. I live here because my parents had sex here.

2. People can't just pick up and move to another country whenever they feel like it. Other countries have laws restricting your ability to do that. Your argument is entirely dependent on the laws of other countries. And some people simply don't have the money to move. So what you're saying is that only people with the means to relocate to another country should have all the rights they believe they deserve.

3. Why should I just run away every time my rights are violated? I would rather stand up for myself and the rights of others who may not have the option of moving to another country.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks. You said that much better than I managed. I plead mild drunkenness. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:29 AM
Ron Burgundy Ron Burgundy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ronpaul2008.com
Posts: 5,208
Default Re: Yes, finally another Ron Paul-thread

[ QUOTE ]
3. I dont see the restrictions in regards of internet-poker as have so much to do with internet-regulation as it has to do with the government wanting to control gambling or keep gambling-money inside the country. Of course the internet poker probably was the thing that caused the regulation, but the issue was the gambling itself. If people somehow used their telephones or letter-carrying pigeons to place bets/gamble at the same companies at the same level as the internet-poker I suppose they would have tried to regulate that as well. So I was more wondering if there is a threath of the government wanting to tax use of the internet or trying to control what pages people get access to and what is permitted on the internet (I know they attack children-porn, but I think most people see that as a good thing).

[/ QUOTE ]

So you're talking more about censorship? I'm not sure what the candidates stances on censorship are. I remember Tipper Gore (Al Gore's wife) ranting about how the internet, TV, and movies need to be forced to stop using dirty words and show naked ladies, or something to that effect.

From the way John Edwards talks, it seems he would probably support strict regulation of internet content. He sounds like one of those "I'm here to save you from yourself" types.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:31 AM
JayTee JayTee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,149
Default Re: Yes, finally another Ron Paul-thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"Love it or Leave it" OK comrade.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good try, but anyone with half a mind will see past that. Especially since I've included an example of "love it or leave it".

You're just embarassing yourself now.

[/ QUOTE ]

you said:

[ QUOTE ]
If you're not okay with our rules, then you really should leave. That's part of the social contract of choosing to live in a civilized society. If you don't like our rules, you're very free to leave. If you think rule of law is BS, by all means, that actually IS one of the things I think a person should exit stage left for. (As opposed to the phony patriotic "if you don't like bush, get out!" rhetoric you'll hear on ultra-conservative radioshows and such)

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree with your statement on the same grounds that you disagree with the "if you don't like bush, get out!" argument. Both positions are advocating "love it or leave it". How then have I embarrassed myself?
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:33 AM
Low Key Low Key is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 548
Default Re: Yes, finally another Ron Paul-thread

[ QUOTE ]
So? The government doesn't own the land, private individuals do. Unless you're saying there's no private property in America?

[/ QUOTE ]

You can't, like, own land, man.

Of course private individuals own their own land. And they chose to buy that land in America. America didn't choose them to live here.

I say this:

[ QUOTE ]
Also, I can't wait til all these posts are deleted since we completely highjacked this thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

and you think I mean this:

[ QUOTE ]
Any board that is as iron-handed as you describe is a crappy, crappy board.

[/ QUOTE ]

He said.. she said.. la la la la... At this point like 1/3 of this thread is just anarchists and me bickering. As much as I love the sound of my own fingers tappity-tapping on the keyboard, I don't love it that much. And even more so given that this was a topic I was actually interested in. I don't like feeling like our argumentative crap will disuade others from answering/reading answers to Bedreviter's questions.

If you all want to keep attacking me in private messages, feel free to. I get the feeling Alex won't, since most of his arguments are fundamentally flawed and he could use all the help he can get from other anarchy friends.

I get the feeling Ron Burgundy would eventually best me, though his most recent post doesn't really do it for me.

You guys want anarchy in America, I don't. We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.