|
|
#91
08-28-2007, 03:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: cash out curse on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Quit being retarded....how much you making an hour to defend these turds. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not being paid by PS (or any other online gaming provider). However, if they or any other site wanted to employ me, they can PM or email me all job offers. [ QUOTE ] Learn to read. It was an example retard. [/ QUOTE ] But the example you used is false. 'Cause they couldn't have given that algorithm. [/ QUOTE ] You are seriously being an idiot. IT WAS AN EXAMPLE DOUCHE TARD. 
|
|
#93
08-28-2007, 03:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: cash out curse on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] IT WAS AN EXAMPLE DOUCHE TARD. [/ QUOTE ] ...which was false. [/ QUOTE ] No [censored] sherlock...it was an example. You do know what an example is right?
|
|
#94
08-28-2007, 03:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: cash out curse on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
No [censored] sherlock...it was an example. You do know what an example is right? [/ QUOTE ] Yes. An example is a hypothetical situation which could be applicable to the situation at hand. But your hypothetical isn't possible - it is a lie to say that PokerStars could've provided that algorithm to Cinetel for verification, 'cause they could not have. You need to stop lying. You need to stop being a lying liar who lies.... or you need to admit that you were wrong and ignorant to provide that example. This whole thread is littered with your lies and half-truths, so it is about time that you lifted your game and started to develop some integrity. You continue to make serious criminal allegations against people, incredible slurs against people's livelihoods, and you provide no evidence to support them. That is a dirty, dirty, way of living a life.
|
|
#95
08-28-2007, 04:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: cash out curse on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] No [censored] sherlock...it was an example. You do know what an example is right? [/ QUOTE ] Yes. An example is a hypothetical situation which could be applicable to the situation at hand. But your hypothetical isn't possible - it is a lie to say that PokerStars could've provided that algorithm to Cinetel for verification, 'cause they could not have. You need to stop lying. You need to stop being a lying liar who lies.... or you need to admit that you were wrong and ignorant to provide that example. This whole thread is littered with your lies and half-truths, so it is about time that you lifted your game and started to develop some integrity. You continue to make serious criminal allegations against people, incredible slurs against people's livelihoods, and you provide no evidence to support them. That is a dirty, dirty, way of living a life. [/ QUOTE ] Josem, you are officially retarded. I simply asked for proof that its legit, you couldn't give me any. Keep douching on douche bag. lol at criminal allegations... oh, why couldn't they have sent Cigital an algorithm? LOL How do you suppose Cigital tested their algorithm? There's nothing criminal about rigging a poker site, sorry buddy. There's nothing more dirty then a con artist, your gig is up.
|
|
#96
08-28-2007, 04:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: cash out curse on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
I simply asked for proof that its legit, you couldn't give me any. [/ QUOTE ] The proof is in the page by PokerStars and the independent analysis by the two security firms. That is clearly proof. You can argue about the strength of it, but it is certainly some proof. [ QUOTE ] oh, why couldn't they have sent Cigital an algorithm? LOL [/ QUOTE ] They couldn't have sent that algorithm to Cigital because that algorithm is flawed. Cigital would not have endorsed it. [ QUOTE ] How do you suppose Cigital tested their algorithm? [/ QUOTE ] I don't know. If I knew how to do that testing, I'd start a business in doing it, because I think it would be a lucrative industry now and into the future. [ QUOTE ] There's nothing criminal about rigging a poker site, sorry buddy. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, there is. It would seem to be a pretty clear case of fraud under Australian law - I assume that most other western countries would think likewise.
|
|
#97
08-28-2007, 04:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: cash out curse on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I simply asked for proof that its legit, you couldn't give me any. [/ QUOTE ] The proof is in the page by PokerStars and the independent analysis by the two security firms. That is clearly proof. You can argue about the strength of it, but it is certainly some proof. [ QUOTE ] oh, why couldn't they have sent Cigital an algorithm? LOL [/ QUOTE ] They couldn't have sent that algorithm to Cigital because that algorithm is flawed. Cigital would not have endorsed it. [ QUOTE ] How do you suppose Cigital tested their algorithm? [/ QUOTE ] I don't know. If I knew how to do that testing, I'd start a business in doing it, because I think it would be a lucrative industry now and into the future. [ QUOTE ] There's nothing criminal about rigging a poker site, sorry buddy. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, there is. It would seem to be a pretty clear case of fraud under Australian law - I assume that most other western countries would think likewise. [/ QUOTE ] You continue to be a moron. You're still clinging on to my EXAMPLE? BWHAHAHAH. Oh btw. You assume wrong. There is no US gaming commission that oversees and regulates online poker...they can rigg it up all they want.
|
|
#98
08-28-2007, 04:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: cash out curse on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
Oh btw. You assume wrong. There is no US gaming commission that oversees and regulates online poker...they can rigg it up all they want. [/ QUOTE ] In Australia, we have people employed as "Police". Typically, they are responsible for enforcing the criminal law, including laws relating to fraud.
|
|
#99
08-28-2007, 04:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: cash out curse on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Oh btw. You assume wrong. There is no US gaming commission that oversees and regulates online poker...they can rigg it up all they want. [/ QUOTE ] In Australia, we have people employed as "Police". Typically, they are responsible for enforcing the criminal law, including laws relating to fraud. [/ QUOTE ] bwahahahahahahaha I better call 911 and have them flyout to pokerstars server location. bwahahahahah You're an idiot. How many times do I have to say it? There is no gaming commission in the US that regulates online poker.... DUCY?
|
|
#100
08-28-2007, 11:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: cash out curse on Stars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Ugh, Cigital isn't a company that is out to validate online poker sites. They are for hire like anyone else. Riverstars hired them to evaluate their rng ....or better yet it sounds like their algorithm. I have questions, did they test their rng in operation or did pokerstars give them the algorithm they use? So easy to get by this and make this claim. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe so, maybe not. Hopefully the reply to your e-mail will tell. BTW an RNG is an algorithm. I understand that,,,I'm saying did they close up shop and let Cigital come in and test their rng (THE ACTUAL SERVER IT RUNS ON )or did they just send them the algorithm they use... Question: Back to your donkament bad beats, what's PokerStars' incentive for rigging a tournament hand so that you get sucked out on? [/ QUOTE ] Rake...DUCY? [/ QUOTE ] I don't. Please explain. [/ QUOTE ] [x] profit DUCY NOW? [/ QUOTE ] Nope. [/ QUOTE ] Could you please explain how they profit from this, realjaydub?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
