#91
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Joe Seboks blog post - Re: Ikes play
[ QUOTE ]
Brag: I wrote the e-mail that got on PokerWire about this Beat: It's not that interesting + I'm dumb Variance: Joe Sebok thinks the Gap Theory is trash and can't define it? [/ QUOTE ] LOL hand ranges... what are you, some kind of nerd? |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Joe Seboks blog post - Re: Ikes play
lol, he called Ike "The little man". At least he's not going to beat him up though.
|
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Joe Seboks blog post - Re: Ikes play
Blah blah another std live player who has little to no concept of these wacky things like "resteals" and "Pot odds".
Ike>Sebok and i do not give a [censored] how much in cashes Sebok has. I already know he's slightly better than a std donk, so sure, fine, he's +EV in a live donkament. That doesn't mean he's actually any good. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Joe Seboks blog post - Re: Ikes play
[ QUOTE ]
lol, he called Ike "The little man". At least he's not going to beat him up though. [/ QUOTE ] Where does Sebok get off calling anyone a little man? I'm fairly sure i almost stepped on his head once. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Joe Seboks blog post - Re: Ikes play
Word I'm listening to the latest episode right now and joe is really pissing me off. His total ignorance of the skill of online players in general is upsetting... I think he's funny and interesting but he hasn't shown anything exceptional through his play, he seems pretty standard.
On the other hand, his father certainly respects the online players (through aba, etc.) and could certainly explain the gap theory and restealing strategy. But if ike is reshoving KJo 50 bbs deep or something like that, I don't know how much we can defend him. The details of the hand are very unclear, I would like to hear definitive stacks/blinds for the hand. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Joe Seboks blog post - Re: Ikes play
lol @ sebok, grudge match is only a matter of time
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Joe Seboks blog post - Re: Ikes play
Joe Sebok complained ENDLESSLY in a 10k event when he lost two (yes, TWO) coinflips. Once he had AK that lost to QQ, the other time he had QQ that lost to AK. Had he won them both he would have been chip leader...and he let the table know this for about 45 minutes until, mercifully, it broke.
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Joe Seboks blog post - Re: Ikes play
lol at him describing the second level of thinking as an impossible level
|
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Joe Seboks blog post - Re: Ikes play
Umm, am I the only one who realises that Joe is a PROFESSIONAL and as such he is right and people who post on internet forums are wrong? Geez.
|
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Joe Seboks blog post - Re: Ikes play
[ QUOTE ]
Umm, am I the only one who realises that Joe is a PROFESSIONAL and as such he is right and people who post on internet forums are wrong? Geez. [/ QUOTE ] Sarcasm...? I hope. |
|
|